Please, you're splitting hairs over aesthetic preferences and MO. It's all the same, no matter how its rephrased.
There's always been a gross misunderstanding from the get go, that's why there's so many sheep parading around in wolf's clothing. The Right-handed always wants to convince the masses they are Lefties. The why of it, is always apparent.
Maybe you need to move on Dimi, you've been on this same shtick for years now. At best, we banter on a forum. Serious study of Satanism... Ha. I bet you really believe that too.
A serious study of Satanism is by nature a personal affair. You couldnít possibly do an accurate one because everyoneís personal path is unique. Unless the point is to highlight the accomplishments of the more well known/outspoken Satanists of the current guard.
It's been argued that a 'sincere study' here on the forum is prevented by clown users. If, one were to use the user feedback here as a datamine, do you feel that would be useful in that personal affair?
FYI, the term clown users was used by Dark Magician in your own thread about SIN3 and the Temple of Set in the response to Aquino. It referred to SIN and Dread. The point was that they prevent others from engaging in a serious discussion about LaVey's genius philosophy. It's a fairly recent discussion so no, you aren't paying attention.
That old thread? Forgotten. But since itís brought back up again, Dark Magician is correct, in a sense.
Iím not a huge LaVey fan personally, so I donít really have a horse in that race, but I respect that others who want to sincerely and intelligently discuss his writings and life would like to do so without the distraction of the debate tournament occult nerds derailing every thread in this way.
The one derailing the threads is you. Nearly every discussion you participate in eventually leads to your whining about the forum and bickering with SIN. You even dedicated the whole long thread to her. If SIN is a drama queen, you certainly managed to outdo her with your "cause drama while pretending to be bored" schtick.
If you're interested in seriously discussing LaVey's writings, you're welcome to create a thread. I'm sure nobody will attack you for that.
If, one were to use the user feedback here as a datamine, do you feel that would be useful in that personal affair?
Other users have stated that by conversing here, they have outside input while also treading on their personal path.
Do you think that's what he's referring to? It's not as if 'sincere' discussion hasn't occurred here. It's that as of late, the current active user base isn't on that track. Seems more like daily banter.