Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
#116616 - 07/28/18 03:18 PM Teleiophiles
Timi Offline
stranger


Registered: 07/28/18
Posts: 7
Loc: Finland
Like we all know, media is full of anti-pedophile message. There is a pedophile/hebephile witch hunt going on.
But why doesn't anyone talk about teleiophiles = minors attracted to adults?
I'm sure there are many of those preteen girls who like older guys, but because of a modern anti-male culture, men are always seen as abusers and rapists.
Also could it be that some of the pedophile-teleiophilic relationships are actually ruined by the social attitudes and the (age of consent) law, not the evil molester monster men?


Edited by Timi (07/28/18 03:19 PM)
_________________________
Coming soon.

Top
#116617 - 07/28/18 03:55 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Timi]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1242
Loc: CA
They are usually abused (it doesn't even need to be sexual) young by an older family member. This happens most commonly with girls in the form "Daddy Issues". The 14 year old girl fucking a 29 year old.

The attraction arises from being warped good pre-adolensce, and switches to the inverse at adulthood. Everyone in one if those "relationships" is mentally fucked.

Top
#116618 - 07/28/18 07:55 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
Sabrina27 Offline
member


Registered: 01/21/17
Posts: 121
10yrs old should not be engaging in sexual encounters because their frontal lobe is not yet developed to be making sexual decisions regardless whether you're a child prodigy or not. They're still a child mentally and physically.
_________________________
Knowledge without action is void & Action without knowledge is madness

Top
#116622 - 07/29/18 06:46 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Sabrina27]
Zeno Offline
member


Registered: 03/15/15
Posts: 132
Teleiophiles, if they exist, are so small in number, that they are of no relevance to society. The majority of those who sexually abuse children over the age of 18 convince themselves that children like the abuse, and justify this in some manner that children solicited the abuse. Most victims of child sex abuse have been manipulated or forced into the abuse by the adult. In most prisons, if an individual is known to have harmed a child, they are attacked or killed, which sums up the general attitude of society to the sexual abuse of children.
_________________________
Greece, the Bankers bitch.

Top
#116639 - 07/30/18 12:01 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Timi]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7064
Loc: Virginia
There's been plenty of exploration of biology vs. sociology. Society intervenes in pursuit of older partners to thwart trends in decision making. This decade is no better or worse than previous ones in that regard. Laurels are firmly rested on abuse, grooming, and deficiency; but especially acceptance.

No teen wants to be regarded a freak for their preferences and yet? Older partners are chosen regardless of mainstream acceptance. Regardless of Child Protection Laws.

#Heterodoxy
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116643 - 07/31/18 12:25 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Timi]
Dimitri Offline
stalker


Registered: 07/13/08
Posts: 3259
Generally, if such relationships occur, the adult will be labelled as pedophile and the other one largely ignored.

Quick question... why the interest?
What's your motivation to ask this question.
_________________________
Ut vivat, crescat et floreat

Top
#116649 - 07/31/18 07:45 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
ShadowLover Offline
member


Registered: 05/26/16
Posts: 327
Loc: Gold Coast, Australia
 Originally Posted By: Timi
Also could it be that some of the pedophile-teleiophilic relationships are actually ruined by the social attitudes and the (age of consent) law, not the evil molester monster men?


Who are you trying to kid? The urge to protect innocent minors was around long before any age of consent laws. It's a primal instinct! Paedophilia laws protect the paedophiles... Take away the law and you are just left with a Daddy who wants to remove your balls and drop your guts on the ground for the pigs to eat. In nature kids have no rights, so fuck some pre-pubescent crush - in nature if you want to fuck a young girl you have to get past the parents and/or protective guardians; so you had better be quick, smart or rich!

And then lastly, if you don't think men are potential monsters than you haven't explored the dark side of masculinity. And that is in no way intended to be a slight against men - just an observation. They wouldn't survive in the wild if they didn't have some monster potential.




Edited by ShadowLover (07/31/18 07:47 AM)
_________________________
Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.

Top
#116650 - 07/31/18 01:27 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1242
Loc: CA
I forgot to talk about males that seek older female partners. Different standards for each dynamic.

 Quote:
#heterodoxy


I disagree. Society condones and applauds the teenage boy fucking the MILF and Cougar. It's a heterosexual relationship that exemplifies a true "Alpha Male".

Orthodox response to males fucking older women. That generally ends at 21.   It ceases to be a rite of passage to bang the MILF.

Reverse it and it's still Daddy Issues for the girls. 

Old/young lesbian shit is all over Pornhub. How many "Horny mom fucks her step-daughter" videos does the internet really need? Still, seems to be in demand and accepted.

And I cant click on the "gay" category without seeing a bunch of really disturbing hairless twink videos.

Porn teaches us so much.

Top
#116651 - 07/31/18 05:26 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7064
Loc: Virginia
I think you're missing the point. The minors don't give a shit about laws, their parents or what society has to say about it. If they want to pursue it they will.

And I don't think there's mainstream acceptance, regardless of gender. Mob Mentality made minimum ages and consent laws possible.

And using the Pornography Archive as proof is just Myopic. I'd expect nothing less from you.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116652 - 07/31/18 06:15 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1242
Loc: CA
 Quote:
Mob Mentality made minimum ages and consent laws possible.


Yes if it wasn't for those draconian consent laws we'd be all about fucking children.

There couldn't be a reason not totally connected to mob mentality?

Human life span. You dont need to knock them up when their 14 anymore, childhood doesnt end at puberty. Increased lifespan, coddling attitude has pushed back the age of maturity. This actually transfers to attraction. One rewrites the other.

Do you see a 14 year old with an immature fresh face and body as attractive? I bet you don't. 2000 years of child protecting domestication (where applicable) bred it out of people, IMO.

Also, I'm fine being a myopic slave that drinks the "save the children" kool-aid. I don't have an attraction to justify.

Myopic? Naw, internet analytics are the purest insight into an unfiltered cilture.


Top
#116654 - 07/31/18 08:31 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
ShadowLover Offline
member


Registered: 05/26/16
Posts: 327
Loc: Gold Coast, Australia
 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Everyone in one if those "relationships" is mentally fucked.


Beautifully put and I totally agree with this...
Sure, a 14yo girl can be attracted to an older man, but normally that older man will be 19yo and still pretty smooth faced. Not 40yo! I think when I was 14yo I was crushing on Michael Jackson. He would have been 25yo at the time but he was famous(and sold to us) and only looked 20yo.

 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Do you see a 14 year old with an immature fresh face and body as attractive? I bet you don't. 2000 years of child protecting domestication (where applicable) bred it out of people, IMO.


Actually, I think it is perfectly normal for a man to be physically attracted to a 14yo. If it has hips and tits and it bleeds it is biologically fair game. I've known plenty of men to object to the way young girls dress because frankly it makes them nervous. Especially if the girl is an early developer and curvy. It has been my experience that men become quite angry at the parents for not better protecting their daughters - they know what danger lurks out there and they know not all men will show the restraint that most choose to.

Most men will never pursue a girl so young, not just because of the laws but because most men want more out of a partner than a 8 babies these days. They want a partner in crime - someone they can share a path with on equal footing. Someone that is mature enough to support them if they need such.

Men who go genuinely gooey over young girls are usually pretty screwed up themselves. They are not men in the heart. They are either damaged or simply piss ants! Sometimes both. They are weak and can't stand up against somebody confident. Or they are so bad in the sack that they need someone completely inexperienced who will never know the difference. They need someone who is easy to manipulate because they lack control in their own lives.

And liking young girls as a fetish is just that - a fetish! Men in this category don't actually love the girls, they just want to play with them. As the girls age, these men will lose interest and seek out another young girl to play with, often destroying the first in the process. All for sexual gratification. These are the ones I would like to see cage fighting with mums and dads and bikers.
_________________________
Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.

Top
#116656 - 08/01/18 10:30 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7064
Loc: Virginia
 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Yes if it wasn't for those draconian consent laws we'd be all about fucking children.

There couldn't be a reason not totally connected to mob mentality?



Culture shift is mob mentality. Majority rule.

 Quote:
Human life span. You dont need to knock them up when their 14 anymore, childhood doesnt end at puberty. Increased lifespan, coddling attitude has pushed back the age of maturity. This actually transfers to attraction. One rewrites the other.


Lifespan didn't end at puberty when marriage was acceptable at 13 either. Believe it or not, elderly people existed at the turn of the 19th century.

 Quote:
Do you see a 14 year old with an immature fresh face and body as attractive? I bet you don't. 2000 years of child protecting domestication (where applicable) bred it out of people, IMO.


Oh so now it's about attraction and not species survival? So which is it?

 Quote:

Also, I'm fine being a myopic slave that drinks the "save the children" kool-aid. I don't have an attraction to justify.

Myopic? Naw, internet analytics are the purest insight into an unfiltered cilture.



I bet you really are convinced you're correct.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116659 - 08/01/18 03:26 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1242
Loc: CA
OK I will lay out my theory on this. At the moment I am quite comfortable with it.

Increased life span reprogrammed our minds like the once feral cat being domesticated to instinctually use a litter box.

In 1800 life was short, 30% of infants died at birth, medicine was non existent, and the ritual for childhood didnt involve the high school prom.

Since the advent of modern medicine the entire youth experience pushed back as the ritual of it all was set. According to western standard the ritual of childhood, when they "come out" like a debutant yuppie, is when they  set off to college.  The age of consent isn't arbitrary, it's taken from the ritualistic end of childhood at 17-19. The transition out of the nest.  Enroll, enlist, explore it (ideally) all happens after the Senior Trip.

And while everyone doesn't follow that exact path, it is "majority rule".

200 years of changing pomp and circumstance of modern childhood has pushed back what society views as ready, and it falls around 18 in EVERY modern society.  What humans see as attractive is an adaptation to a social environment. When successive generations view childhood differently it rewrites human instinctual approach to them as partners. You will be more likely to want to protect them until they teach breeding age.

*A caveat being*

Sexualization at pre-pubescence is one thing that can knock this attraction out of kilter. But in this case traumatic local influences overpower the societal ones in sexual developement.

Probe at will.

Top
#116699 - 08/07/18 12:12 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7064
Loc: Virginia
It is your assertion that marriage at age 13 was solely for the purpose of increasing population. Now, you have to prove it.

That infant mortality rates increased after the advent of discoveries in medicine, improved living conditions and nutrution.

Even then, the age of consent to marry in Texas was age 14 until a few years back and as a way to persecute the FLDS church.

Try again...
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116702 - 08/07/18 05:57 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1242
Loc: CA
To Who?

Who do I have to prove this to?

Satanism's in joke?

The poster child for the Dunning-Kruger Effect?

Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  Woland, TV is God, fakepropht, SkaffenAmtiskaw, Asmedious, Fist 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.032 seconds of which 0.009 seconds were spent on 28 queries. Zlib compression disabled.