Page all of 2 12>
Topic Options
#116616 - 07/28/18 03:18 PM Teleiophiles
Timi Offline
stranger


Registered: 07/28/18
Posts: 7
Loc: Finland
Like we all know, media is full of anti-pedophile message. There is a pedophile/hebephile witch hunt going on.
But why doesn't anyone talk about teleiophiles = minors attracted to adults?
I'm sure there are many of those preteen girls who like older guys, but because of a modern anti-male culture, men are always seen as abusers and rapists.
Also could it be that some of the pedophile-teleiophilic relationships are actually ruined by the social attitudes and the (age of consent) law, not the evil molester monster men?


Edited by Timi (07/28/18 03:19 PM)
_________________________
Coming soon.

Top
#116617 - 07/28/18 03:55 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Timi]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
They are usually abused (it doesn't even need to be sexual) young by an older family member. This happens most commonly with girls in the form "Daddy Issues". The 14 year old girl fucking a 29 year old.

The attraction arises from being warped good pre-adolensce, and switches to the inverse at adulthood. Everyone in one if those "relationships" is mentally fucked.
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#116618 - 07/28/18 07:55 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
Sabrina27 Offline
member


Registered: 01/21/17
Posts: 158
10yrs old should not be engaging in sexual encounters because their frontal lobe is not yet developed to be making sexual decisions regardless whether you're a child prodigy or not. They're still a child mentally and physically.
_________________________
Knowledge without action is void & Action without knowledge is madness

Top
#116622 - 07/29/18 06:46 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Sabrina27]
Zeno Offline
member


Registered: 03/15/15
Posts: 146
Teleiophiles, if they exist, are so small in number, that they are of no relevance to society. The majority of those who sexually abuse children over the age of 18 convince themselves that children like the abuse, and justify this in some manner that children solicited the abuse. Most victims of child sex abuse have been manipulated or forced into the abuse by the adult. In most prisons, if an individual is known to have harmed a child, they are attacked or killed, which sums up the general attitude of society to the sexual abuse of children.
_________________________
Greece, the Bankers bitch.

Top
#116639 - 07/30/18 12:01 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Timi]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7190
Loc: Virginia
There's been plenty of exploration of biology vs. sociology. Society intervenes in pursuit of older partners to thwart trends in decision making. This decade is no better or worse than previous ones in that regard. Laurels are firmly rested on abuse, grooming, and deficiency; but especially acceptance.

No teen wants to be regarded a freak for their preferences and yet? Older partners are chosen regardless of mainstream acceptance. Regardless of Child Protection Laws.

#Heterodoxy
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116643 - 07/31/18 12:25 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Timi]
Dimitri Offline
stalker


Registered: 07/13/08
Posts: 3385
Generally, if such relationships occur, the adult will be labelled as pedophile and the other one largely ignored.

Quick question... why the interest?
What's your motivation to ask this question.
_________________________
Ut vivat, crescat et floreat

Top
#116649 - 07/31/18 07:45 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
ShadowLover Offline
member


Registered: 05/26/16
Posts: 351
Loc: Gold Coast, Australia
 Originally Posted By: Timi
Also could it be that some of the pedophile-teleiophilic relationships are actually ruined by the social attitudes and the (age of consent) law, not the evil molester monster men?


Who are you trying to kid? The urge to protect innocent minors was around long before any age of consent laws. It's a primal instinct! Paedophilia laws protect the paedophiles... Take away the law and you are just left with a Daddy who wants to remove your balls and drop your guts on the ground for the pigs to eat. In nature kids have no rights, so fuck some pre-pubescent crush - in nature if you want to fuck a young girl you have to get past the parents and/or protective guardians; so you had better be quick, smart or rich!

And then lastly, if you don't think men are potential monsters than you haven't explored the dark side of masculinity. And that is in no way intended to be a slight against men - just an observation. They wouldn't survive in the wild if they didn't have some monster potential.




Edited by ShadowLover (07/31/18 07:47 AM)
_________________________
Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.

Top
#116650 - 07/31/18 01:27 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
I forgot to talk about males that seek older female partners. Different standards for each dynamic.

 Quote:
#heterodoxy


I disagree. Society condones and applauds the teenage boy fucking the MILF and Cougar. It's a heterosexual relationship that exemplifies a true "Alpha Male".

Orthodox response to males fucking older women. That generally ends at 21.   It ceases to be a rite of passage to bang the MILF.

Reverse it and it's still Daddy Issues for the girls. 

Old/young lesbian shit is all over Pornhub. How many "Horny mom fucks her step-daughter" videos does the internet really need? Still, seems to be in demand and accepted.

And I cant click on the "gay" category without seeing a bunch of really disturbing hairless twink videos.

Porn teaches us so much.
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#116651 - 07/31/18 05:26 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7190
Loc: Virginia
I think you're missing the point. The minors don't give a shit about laws, their parents or what society has to say about it. If they want to pursue it they will.

And I don't think there's mainstream acceptance, regardless of gender. Mob Mentality made minimum ages and consent laws possible.

And using the Pornography Archive as proof is just Myopic. I'd expect nothing less from you.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116652 - 07/31/18 06:15 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
 Quote:
Mob Mentality made minimum ages and consent laws possible.


Yes if it wasn't for those draconian consent laws we'd be all about fucking children.

There couldn't be a reason not totally connected to mob mentality?

Human life span. You dont need to knock them up when their 14 anymore, childhood doesnt end at puberty. Increased lifespan, coddling attitude has pushed back the age of maturity. This actually transfers to attraction. One rewrites the other.

Do you see a 14 year old with an immature fresh face and body as attractive? I bet you don't. 2000 years of child protecting domestication (where applicable) bred it out of people, IMO.

Also, I'm fine being a myopic slave that drinks the "save the children" kool-aid. I don't have an attraction to justify.

Myopic? Naw, internet analytics are the purest insight into an unfiltered cilture.

_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#116654 - 07/31/18 08:31 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
ShadowLover Offline
member


Registered: 05/26/16
Posts: 351
Loc: Gold Coast, Australia
 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Everyone in one if those "relationships" is mentally fucked.


Beautifully put and I totally agree with this...
Sure, a 14yo girl can be attracted to an older man, but normally that older man will be 19yo and still pretty smooth faced. Not 40yo! I think when I was 14yo I was crushing on Michael Jackson. He would have been 25yo at the time but he was famous(and sold to us) and only looked 20yo.

 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Do you see a 14 year old with an immature fresh face and body as attractive? I bet you don't. 2000 years of child protecting domestication (where applicable) bred it out of people, IMO.


Actually, I think it is perfectly normal for a man to be physically attracted to a 14yo. If it has hips and tits and it bleeds it is biologically fair game. I've known plenty of men to object to the way young girls dress because frankly it makes them nervous. Especially if the girl is an early developer and curvy. It has been my experience that men become quite angry at the parents for not better protecting their daughters - they know what danger lurks out there and they know not all men will show the restraint that most choose to.

Most men will never pursue a girl so young, not just because of the laws but because most men want more out of a partner than a 8 babies these days. They want a partner in crime - someone they can share a path with on equal footing. Someone that is mature enough to support them if they need such.

Men who go genuinely gooey over young girls are usually pretty screwed up themselves. They are not men in the heart. They are either damaged or simply piss ants! Sometimes both. They are weak and can't stand up against somebody confident. Or they are so bad in the sack that they need someone completely inexperienced who will never know the difference. They need someone who is easy to manipulate because they lack control in their own lives.

And liking young girls as a fetish is just that - a fetish! Men in this category don't actually love the girls, they just want to play with them. As the girls age, these men will lose interest and seek out another young girl to play with, often destroying the first in the process. All for sexual gratification. These are the ones I would like to see cage fighting with mums and dads and bikers.
_________________________
Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.

Top
#116656 - 08/01/18 10:30 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7190
Loc: Virginia
 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Yes if it wasn't for those draconian consent laws we'd be all about fucking children.

There couldn't be a reason not totally connected to mob mentality?



Culture shift is mob mentality. Majority rule.

 Quote:
Human life span. You dont need to knock them up when their 14 anymore, childhood doesnt end at puberty. Increased lifespan, coddling attitude has pushed back the age of maturity. This actually transfers to attraction. One rewrites the other.


Lifespan didn't end at puberty when marriage was acceptable at 13 either. Believe it or not, elderly people existed at the turn of the 19th century.

 Quote:
Do you see a 14 year old with an immature fresh face and body as attractive? I bet you don't. 2000 years of child protecting domestication (where applicable) bred it out of people, IMO.


Oh so now it's about attraction and not species survival? So which is it?

 Quote:

Also, I'm fine being a myopic slave that drinks the "save the children" kool-aid. I don't have an attraction to justify.

Myopic? Naw, internet analytics are the purest insight into an unfiltered cilture.



I bet you really are convinced you're correct.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116659 - 08/01/18 03:26 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
OK I will lay out my theory on this. At the moment I am quite comfortable with it.

Increased life span reprogrammed our minds like the once feral cat being domesticated to instinctually use a litter box.

In 1800 life was short, 30% of infants died at birth, medicine was non existent, and the ritual for childhood didnt involve the high school prom.

Since the advent of modern medicine the entire youth experience pushed back as the ritual of it all was set. According to western standard the ritual of childhood, when they "come out" like a debutant yuppie, is when they  set off to college.  The age of consent isn't arbitrary, it's taken from the ritualistic end of childhood at 17-19. The transition out of the nest.  Enroll, enlist, explore it (ideally) all happens after the Senior Trip.

And while everyone doesn't follow that exact path, it is "majority rule".

200 years of changing pomp and circumstance of modern childhood has pushed back what society views as ready, and it falls around 18 in EVERY modern society.  What humans see as attractive is an adaptation to a social environment. When successive generations view childhood differently it rewrites human instinctual approach to them as partners. You will be more likely to want to protect them until they teach breeding age.

*A caveat being*

Sexualization at pre-pubescence is one thing that can knock this attraction out of kilter. But in this case traumatic local influences overpower the societal ones in sexual developement.

Probe at will.
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#116699 - 08/07/18 12:12 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7190
Loc: Virginia
It is your assertion that marriage at age 13 was solely for the purpose of increasing population. Now, you have to prove it.

That infant mortality rates increased after the advent of discoveries in medicine, improved living conditions and nutrution.

Even then, the age of consent to marry in Texas was age 14 until a few years back and as a way to persecute the FLDS church.

Try again...
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116702 - 08/07/18 05:57 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
To Who?

Who do I have to prove this to?

Satanism's in joke?

The poster child for the Dunning-Kruger Effect?
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#116707 - 08/08/18 05:19 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7190
Loc: Virginia
To yourself perhaps? I mean, you asserted it like you were so sure it's accurate. I wonder, do you ever pull your head out of your own ass on occasion; to test your own knowledge in contrast to why it matters?

Hint: You are not here for me.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#116708 - 08/08/18 07:44 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
samowens84 Offline
active member


Registered: 09/29/16
Posts: 662
 Originally Posted By: SIN3
To yourself perhaps? I mean, you asserted it like you were so sure it's accurate. I wonder, do you ever pull your head out of your own ass on occasion; to test your own knowledge in contrast to why it matters?

Hint: You are not here for me.


Yep. We're all here to be super self-involved egoists living in our own little vacuum while we pretend that nothing we say matters to anyone else but ourselves.

Can we test this theory? Oh wait, can solipsism be tested?

(A bit of self-depricating humor here.) On a personal note I do blogs in response to other blogs and I do learn a thing or two on occassion. Once I've written about it I'm actually content with some things I've learned. If someone were to respond to it and it made them uncomfortable, I'd wonder what it was that made them uncomortable in my response, since, as you said, I didn't do it for you. Like CanisMachine42, you challenged him to look more within himself. Are you here for him or you Sin? Just curious about this isolationist attitude you like to put out there a lot. Not sure you live up to that.

In any case Sin if it doesn't resonate with you then it wasn't meant for you. Of course this is kind of amusing because I happen to agree that Canine Maxima was talking out of his ass. However your language regarding "testing" is an interesing approach to criticism that I feel like poking right now. I've had conversations that when spoken it seems that instant mutual intuitive understanding was beneficial to my personal growth on occassion, and that public scientific scrutiny is cumbersome and inefficient compared to more one on one approaches to growth and development on this "path." i hate calling it a religion or whatever because it's not one thing or one idea, although amusingly people treat it as one. Too much adherence to "scientific methods" are just another grouping mechanism.

I've paid attention to your posts for a long time Sin. You know this already. However, I am having fun poking at this.


Edited by samowens84 (08/08/18 07:50 PM)

Top
#116709 - 08/08/18 10:08 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
 Quote:
Hint: You are not here for me.


Well, that would be sadder than even the truth if I was.

In all actuality I registered originally to get under the skin of a moderator and prolific sock queen that rejected me in 2011.

You came along 3 years in and projected yourself to be a cult of personality in my life that I, for some reason, really need to convince of something... It's bizarre.
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#116710 - 08/09/18 04:14 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
Czereda Offline
senior member


Registered: 03/14/11
Posts: 2118
Loc: Poland
 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
In all actuality I registered originally to get under the skin of a moderator and prolific sock queen that rejected me in 2011.


That's funny because I really can't recall you back in 2011. On the other hand, I hardly remember anything from that year. The only thing that got stuck in my mind was a certain Bobobad (or was it Bobobat?) resurrecting from the cyber ashes as Female Satan. If that's the one you were unsuccessfully dating, you didn't lose much.
_________________________
Anna Czereda
Crazy Cat Lady

Top
#116711 - 08/09/18 04:30 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: Czereda]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
She could've been a liar...

But basically a co-worker of mine in late 2010 or early 2011 brought up "the 600 club". To show what I know I thought she meant "The 700 club"...

After the misunderstanding was cleared up I got to hear all about various escapades, colors she had, creation of a sock account via a proxy. On that one I remember her saying something about "she hated the name she chose" for it.

If anything I was here through oblivious vicariousness.

It's not really doing any good to drop her ident, because she's the type of person you could be interacting with and never know.

Anyway. There's the unnecessary back story.


_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#116715 - 08/09/18 11:04 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
samowens84 Offline
active member


Registered: 09/29/16
Posts: 662
I don't get dissolutioned with people personally. I usually have a gift for seeing people as they are. Sometimes I've had personal cognitive dissonance in some of my past relationships that made it look otherwise, but I always knew that I was the problem. In some fucked up situations there have been some people I've dated that I knew were really good people, but seemed to act in fucked up ways that I didn't understand and so it was more important to figure shit out.

Without going into details it was part personal relationship scientist. If I've ever considered myself a scientist about anything. A, B, and C, don't add up with what I know and love about this person, and so here comes my detective hat or whatever, because the person I love is being framed by some real motherfuckers.

That's another story, and that's old news ;).

I can't help people I care about feeling bad about themselves, but I don't get dissolutioned with people. Mainly because I get satisfaction and resolution by understanding people and a situation that I'm in with precision and detail so that I always leave satisfied. For the most part though if I consider a person a friend and decide I love them then it's for life. Of course not everyone is like that, but that's on them. In that case I tend to love them out of my life.

Seems weird that this forum just got all relationshipy and crap. Kind of funny and amusing in a way. Waiting for the bullshit to come out lol.

Top
#117036 - 09/24/18 09:38 AM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 7190
Loc: Virginia
Even more bizzare, is that you don't see it. The leaps you make to distract from addressing what I've stated.

 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
To Who?

Who do I have to prove this to?

Satanism's in joke?

The poster child for the Dunning-Kruger Effect?


But hey, if you want to just dismiss it, cool by me. You remain stagnate as ever.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#117040 - 09/24/18 03:05 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: SIN3]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
Yeah, I forgot what this was about. Something along the lines of, "It is mundane to see the age of consent as valid", or some other terabyte of child porn styled justification.

 Quote:
But hey, if you want to just dismiss it, cool by me. You remain stagnate as ever.


Stagnation is at least consistant.
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#117041 - 09/24/18 03:49 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
samowens84 Offline
active member


Registered: 09/29/16
Posts: 662
 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Yeah, I forgot what this was about. Something along the lines of, "It is mundane to see the age of consent as valid", or some other terabyte of child porn styled justification.

 Quote:
But hey, if you want to just dismiss it, cool by me. You remain stagnate as ever.


Stagnation is at least consistant.


Yeah this thread was more or less the usual traps for males who are too high on magic to see that they are being set up to commit sex crimes so they can be prosecuted in the world of the mundane like fools. From day one this stratagem has been so transparent as to have been laughable. For females who were too arrogant to imagine any males would catch on, or that some of that arrogance was justified by a world full of ignorant dumbass males too detached from the mundane to see what was going on.

As far as SIN is concerned I'm sure the charge against whoever is that they're so caught up with making friends that their not actually being dynamic enough to work towards their own goals. Consistency is relative. Some may want to make friends, some may want to make a name for themselves, and then there might be some with the audacity to care about both love and success, but whatever.

Top
#117163 - 10/10/18 04:31 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: samowens84]
fiendish Offline
member


Registered: 02/27/16
Posts: 582
This is getting really weird. Like "Gotcha" in a way it's not a game anymore. Fuck, you know whether CanisMachina or Sin3 goes for merit around here. They're fucking qualified as jesters, nothing more.
_________________________

Medulla oblongata

Top
#117166 - 10/10/18 07:13 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: fiendish]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
While you can call me whatever the fuck you want, I am going to ask that you keep at least 6 words between my name and anyone else's name.



Edited by CanisMachina42 (10/10/18 07:28 PM)
Edit Reason: The usual
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#117180 - 10/14/18 04:15 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
XiaoGui17 Online
veteran member


Registered: 10/21/09
Posts: 1345
Loc: Austin, TX
Alright, I'll bite.

 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Human life span. You dont need to knock them up when their 14 anymore, childhood doesnt end at puberty.

And with the medical science that brought us longer lifespans, we also have this hot new thing called contraception. And even before that, the ancients had figured out what a blowjob was.

Biologically, yes, it's generally a good idea for women not to start reproducing until the early 20's or so, and generally not past the mid-30's. (I'll note that there's far less pearl-clutching and moral outrage about middle-aged women using IVF than pregnant teens, but whatev.) But people are often sexually active without reproducing, so the appropriate ages for sexual activity and reproduction are separate (if related) questions.

 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Increased lifespan, coddling attitude has pushed back the age of maturity. This actually transfers to attraction. One rewrites the other.

Oh, horseshit. It may no longer be evolutionarily viable for us to cram our faces full of sugars and fats as soon as we can get our grubby little hands on them, but the vestigial instinct is still there--hence my massive arse. Instincts are pretty damn deeply rooted and do not dissolve in a puff of smoke when they become societally inconvenient.

On that note...

 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
Increased life span reprogrammed our minds like the once feral cat being domesticated to instinctually use a litter box.

Cats bury their shit in the wild to avoid the scent attracting bigger, scarier predators that could kick their ass. The litterbox is simply a convention humans developed that worked off an existing instinct.

Domesticated animals generally work against your claim that instincts change with culture. Animals do all kinds of instinctual things that are contrary to what humans would want, like presenting their owners with dead birds, barking at the mailman, etc.

For that matter, domesticated animals were often deliberately, selectively bred for particular behaviors and traits, whereas that sort of thing is rare in human history, and the majority of breeding is voluntary or for reasons other than the deliberate selection of particular genes. So you're comparing apples and oranges.

 Quote:
Do you see a 14 year old with an immature fresh face and body as attractive? I bet you don't.

If you don't, you are in the minority. It wouldn't be called jailbait if it wasn't tempting.

I didn't look that different at 14 from how I do now at 31. I was the same height, same weight, same cup size, generally the same breast/waist/hip measurements, etc. I had every bit as much body hair. I might have slight wrinkles, slightly lower breasts, and get a stray grey eyebrow hair once a year, but that's about the extent of the physical differences between 14-year-old me and 31-year-old me. And...

 Originally Posted By: CanisMachina42
They are usually abused (it doesn't even need to be sexual) young by an older family member. This happens most commonly with girls in the form "Daddy Issues". The 14 year old girl fucking a 29 year old.

...I was every bit as horny at 14, as well. That doesn't necessarily mean it would've been okay to fuck me. Just because I wanted to doesn't mean I should've. But it's laughable to assert that only abused adolescents want to have sex. I was horny as all living fuck and I certainly wasn't sexually abused or molested. The awakening of sexual instinct is a part of adolescence. Are you telling me you didn't jack off at 12?

 Quote:
Also, I'm fine being a myopic slave that drinks the "save the children" kool-aid. I don't have an attraction to justify.

Whether it's "normal/ common/ natural/ inherent" is a separate question entirely from whether it's justified.

I'll address the moral/ethical side of it later.
_________________________
Wir halten uns an Regeln, Wenn man uns regeln lässt

Top
#117181 - 10/14/18 05:28 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: XiaoGui17]
CanisMachina42 Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/10/13
Posts: 1560
Loc: Ca
Why do people only do this when I pull it out my ass?

Ok I will try.

 Quote:
And with the medical science that brought us longer lifespans, we also have this hot new thing called contraception. And even before that, the ancients had figured out what a blowjob was.

Biologically, yes, it's generally a good idea for women not to start reproducing until the early 20's or so, and generally not past the mid-30's. (I'll note that there's far less pearl-clutching and moral outrage about middle-aged women using IVF than pregnant teens, but whatev.) But people are often sexually active without reproducing, so the appropriate ages for sexual activity and reproduction are separate (if related) questions.


So its not possible for the norms of society to change a social attraction?

You know, if we were the ancient greeks every affluent male would be Jerry Sandusky or L. Ron Hubbard and love those twink service boys.

 Quote:
Oh, horseshit. It may no longer be evolutionarily viable for us to cram our faces full of sugars and fats as soon as we can get our grubby little hands on them, but the vestigial instinct is still there--hence my massive arse. Instincts are pretty damn deeply rooted and do not dissolve in a puff of smoke when they become societally inconvenient.


But it's the beginning of the rewriting with that example. Saturated fats came to light recently. The social mechanism needs a minimal amount of generations to become passed on behavior. In the case of more subtle things like mannerisms and tendency it takes only one generation.

Who knows how a changed attitude will rewire natural inclination. Or the reason people 'naturally' act like their parents.

Lazy reused example: For the same reason a man, even a very gay one, rarely finds the 12 year old fluff boy attractive.

 Quote:
Cats bury their shit in the wild to avoid the scent attracting bigger, scarier predators that could kick their ass. The litterbox is simply a convention humans developed that worked off an existing instinct.

Domesticated animals generally work against your claim that instincts change with culture. Animals do all kinds of instinctual things that are contrary to what humans would want, like presenting their owners with dead birds, barking at the mailman, etc.

For that matter, domesticated animals were often deliberately, selectively bred for particular behaviors and traits, whereas that sort of thing is rare in human history, and the majority of breeding is voluntary or for reasons other than the deliberate selection of particular genes. So you're comparing apples and oranges.


Ok, bad animal domestication example. 

What about overpopulation experiments highlighting environmental conditions in a very drastic example?

Rats when placed evenly distributed among genders into an overcrowded environment  stop reproducing and start fucking the same gender.

Shouldn't anything that influences behavior be considered when it becomes a persistent influence over subsequent generations? You let enough out and they start reproducing again until overpopulated.

Ok now here is the orange to the apple.

Why can't social norms be considered an environmental factor. They matter every bit as much to our behaviors.  As animals our habitat is "civilization". It is not like evolution stops when you shift nomad to Egypt.

Here's more ass-pulling.  Human habitat is accelerated by the very nature of it. What predators other than disease, natural disaster, and other humans does the metropolis dwelling animal have? The environment is an organic ecosystem of human ideas and concepts that must be adapted to as fast as they change...

Best I can do. Have fun.


Edited by CanisMachina42 (10/14/18 06:08 PM)
Edit Reason: NOW I am pretty sure I got it all.
_________________________
32.6
-117.1
Sea level
11:56 PM July, 1st 2019
Wrote Signature

Top
#117270 - 10/23/18 05:48 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: CanisMachina42]
fiendish Offline
member


Registered: 02/27/16
Posts: 582
Not a predator, a carnivore. The hunt is the smell, humane conceptions are merely deceiving, it's an inclusion of blasphemy. To reprehend, what you want to do is what you want to avoid, thus becoming the ultimate wish of you.
_________________________

Medulla oblongata

Top
#117271 - 10/23/18 06:44 PM Re: Teleiophiles [Re: fiendish]
samowens84 Offline
active member


Registered: 09/29/16
Posts: 662
Its not that simple. Sometimes what you want is to be friends, but are wary of perceptions or whatever because fears of triggering shit that could scare a friend you care deeply for off. And even if both friends know what the static is, the impulse is to avoid the static or neutralize it or calm it down because its one psyche bouncing off another. Simplistic analysis and/or false identities is how society tries to reduce the psyche to take away responsibility from the individual, and so take away freedom from people and so on and so forth.

In my personal reaction it has more to do with the fact that I'm including a female in my life and there are still romantic connections between us. But between adults we both communicated our positions and agree out of respect not to get involved that way. Someone else I'm close too is jealous and possessive of me and/or her or whatever, even though as for me I've more then proven myself ethically in terms of wisdom and I don't exclude friends to make other friends feel better. We're adults who know what's up and communicate openly and know what we're about.


Edited by samowens84 (10/23/18 07:21 PM)

Top
Page all of 2 12>


Moderator:  Woland, TV is God, fakepropht, SkaffenAmtiskaw, Asmedious, Fist 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.021 seconds of which 0.002 seconds were spent on 43 queries. Zlib compression disabled.