So the term nothing does not resolve to an 'absence of everything' scenario, instead it refers an alternate, prior, and cyclic reality that transcends the conventional space/time continuum indefinitely.
A somewhat practical definition for this primordial nothingness would be that of an unquantifiable zero volume existence - a precursor to the four dimensional space/time medium; further isolating the primordial consciousness by stripping away its illusive properties.
While this is not absolute nothingness. It is a quantitative reduction that approaches it so as to isolate the true and core fundamentals of the eternal algorithm, rhythm...
It normally only responds to itself, but will react to comments with vitriol. I've called it spam before and got crucified. The term "captive audience" here seems fitting, in that the audience is subjected to yet another pollution. Pollution is unaware of itself and is dictated by whim.
I can kill two birds with one stone here, they never move, so it should be fairly easy.
One of the first things you should learn about "nothing" is that it is not a proper name, and therefore should not be capitalized.
I can agree with some of it to an extent. Personally, I also find it somewhat annoying that whenever I add a new post it is instantly thrown in everyones' face on the recent posts page. This is just the layout of the forum, so it is what it is.
In any event, we sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and as always we welcome your comments, and your feedback is greatly appreciated.
I would also like to add, that, I believe I have exceptional taste in music.
It is presumptuous of you to assume that your exceptional "curated" music has any resonance here among widely divergent tastes. As I said: a captive audience not really keen on Times Square in their face.
Presumptuous to assume? Which is it? You flowery little ass kisser. I do have divergent taste in music; apparently you haven't been paying attention.
There is a plethora of opposition pertaining to your summary; besides I like it. I would not say I am overly thrilled about it; maybe occassionally, but I like it. If you don't, well, it sucks to be you.
Loc: East Coast USA
Originally Posted By: Spida
Originally Posted By: XiaoGui17
The term "divergent" without any contrasting point of reference is meaningless. You could say you have eclectic taste in music, but referring to a single person's tastes as "divergent" is nonsense.
When "divergent" is applied in the absence of any particular style or genre then by default the divergence would be from mainstream or popular.
Again, not applicable since your 14 pages are infested with many Top 40 Radio classics from the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Which are now part of the "classic rock" radio genre. Overplayed for 30 years, and counting, here in the rust belt.
Having a taste not of "any particular style or genre" wouldn't be divergent. It might be diverse, though.
Only Man cares for Man; the Universe doesn't give a shit. -- Marcelo Ramos Motta