Page all of 5 12345>
Topic Options
#25361 - 06/05/09 12:26 AM Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking
Meq Offline
Banned
active member


Registered: 08/28/07
Posts: 861


An open mind that demands no evidence will let in an awful lot of rubbish.

This reminds me of the saying: It's good to be open-minded - but not so open-minded your brain falls out...


Edit: From the Announcements thread:
This was already posted in the Video Discussion Forum, but I decided to re-post it here for all visitors to the home page to see.

New users, consider this "required viewing" before participating in debate.
Such high standards of critical thinking are very much mandatory here.


Edited by Meq (02/19/10 05:45 PM)
Edit Reason: Added link to other thread

Top
#25362 - 06/05/09 12:32 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Meq]
6Satan6Archist6 Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2509
Saw this a few months ago. Good stuff. If only critical thinking were taught in school.
_________________________
No gods. No masters.

Top
#25380 - 06/05/09 12:18 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Meq]
fakepropht Moderator Offline
Big Slick
active member


Registered: 08/29/07
Posts: 990
Loc: Texas
Very well presented and explained. This should be required viewing for every new member that signs up here.
_________________________
Beer, the reason I get up every afternoon.

Top
#25406 - 06/05/09 06:21 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: fakepropht]
Nightmare Offline
pledge


Registered: 04/06/09
Posts: 58
Loc: San Antonio TX
Fake is right this needs to be required for all new members it describes a lot of the arguments that happen here
_________________________
So can you tell me what exactly does freedom mean,
If I'm not free to be as twisted as I wanna be

Top
#25414 - 06/05/09 08:59 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Meq]
Draculesti Offline
Impaler
member


Registered: 09/18/07
Posts: 325
Loc: Rockville, Maryland
I can't tell you how many times I've talked with a Christian (without coming right out and saying I'm a Satanist) and said that, "while I don't believe, I don't entirely discount the possibility of God; however, without empirical evidence to support his supposed existence I remain unconvinced." I have been met with "oh, he's out there; my prayers have been answered." As if that was a definitive argument for the affirmation of his existence. ;\)
_________________________
The Holy Trinity: Me, Myself, and I.

Homo Homini Lupus

Top
#25421 - 06/05/09 10:18 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Draculesti]
ZephyrGirl Offline
R.I.P.
active member


Registered: 08/28/07
Posts: 706
Loc: Adelaide Australia
Great video. I think I might have to make my children watch that again and again as they get a little older. LOL

Thanks for putting it up Meq

Zeph
_________________________
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass -
It's about learning to dance in the rain.


Top
#25432 - 06/06/09 12:17 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Meq]
fakepropht Moderator Offline
Big Slick
active member


Registered: 08/29/07
Posts: 990
Loc: Texas
I made this video sticky. At least it will be the first thing you see when you enter this section.
_________________________
Beer, the reason I get up every afternoon.

Top
#25467 - 06/07/09 12:00 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Meq]
Scarlett156 Offline
pledge


Registered: 05/20/09
Posts: 59
Loc: rural Eastern Colorado (USA)
"Open-mindedness"...!! One of my very least favorite phrases. I'm glad to see others share my sentiments, and are motivated to create a little presentation around the idea.

At least this vid gives people who get backed into conversational corners when trying to defend hard-core materialism something to remember at the last ditch. (That's not a sarcastic remark! I am really being sincere.)

People tend to forget that there's scarcely any way to prove anything on the typical internet discussion forum, anyway. If you demand proof from someone who would ultimately have to come to your house, have you come to his house, or meet with you somewhere to show you the proof--think for a moment: Do you REALLY need proof, when faced with the prospect of having to put the guest towels out for someone who's probably a little "eccentric" anyway? I would forego further argument, and have on numerous occasions, upon consideration of the "ultimate showdown" and its possible consequences. (That's why scientists usually try to do things in labs, where the equipment is insured...)

As well, it's usually pointless to provide a hard-core materialist with an experiment that he or she can "try at home" to test something that they classify as paranormal/supernatural (and therefore, not "real"). You know that even if it only takes a few hours total of experimentation, using stuff they already have or can obtain for less than $10, they're not gonna do it. They just want to keep arguing, basically, until you get sick of listening to them and either give in or make some sort of error that they can use against you.

A lot of the time I can (and will) say, "Hey, I'm not trying to get you to accept hearsay as fact! Calm down! Try this experiment where you live, in your town, just do this, this... (etc)"--and they won't even address that, they'll just go back to arguing like I didn't say a thing. (Many--not all, of course, but many--of those who argue for hard-core materialism are not in fact scientists and know little of science, but suppose that it makes them appear smarter to stand on the side of science in any argument where science is involved.)

There is really no way anybody can be "right" in the classic sense on the internet, unless in discussion of something that is already established and can easily be duplicated, such as that the world is round. There are still many people who do not believe that the world is round--personally, I dislike trying to argue with someone like that, but supposing I was so inclined, I would be able to say to that person, "No one on earth believes that the earth is flat, but in case that does not sway your thinking, please mark the place where you are standing and proceed in any direction you choose without changing course--you will find that if you keep going in the same direction, you will eventually return to the place you began."

If no such verification is available for either side of an argument, that in my opinion places the topic into the category of "idle discussion". Idle discussion is of course one of the fun things about the internet. Some people will get kind of excited, which can also be fun at times. ;\)

~~~ yours in Chaos, Scarlett
_________________________
"I can fling poo gooder than u"

Top
#25486 - 06/08/09 02:22 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Meq]
ceruleansteel Offline
active member


Registered: 10/15/07
Posts: 784
Loc: Behind you
This video was awesome. and I was pleased to see that the same guy who made it also had the genesis argument...that's the first time I've ever known anyone else to think of the genesis argument...
Top
#25509 - 06/08/09 08:50 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Scarlett156]
Meq Offline
Banned
active member


Registered: 08/28/07
Posts: 861
This video leans much more strongly towards (epistemological) empiricism than (metaphysical) materialism or physicalism.

The former is a theory of knowledge of the world being derived from objective experience and evidence.
The latter is a claim about the nature of reality (that only matter and physical energy exist, not 'spirits', and consciousness has a physical basis).
The two are often run together, but they are distinct ideas nevertheless.

I'm not sure what you mean by "hardcore materialism", but the upthrust of this video is:
While to dogmatically assert that matter and energy are definitely all that exists might be a closed-minded approach; it is not closed-minded to ask for evidence and reasons FOR the existence of anything immaterial, supernatural, spiritual or otherwise; and without such evidence being available, to refrain for assenting to belief in such concepts (with the possibility of changing one's mind should evidence to the contrary accumulate).

Many people untrained in science and philosophy do take the former position as a kind of dogma. However, this is not how the latter position works, as it is not dogmatic, and to conflate the latter view with the former one is to commit the logical fallacy of a 'straw man'.

The distinction here is much like that between that of 'strong' and 'weak Atheism' (the latter which may overlap with agnosticism).
A 'strong' Atheist asserts that there definitely is no god.
A 'weak' Atheist in contrast merely abstains from giving his assent or belief to the proposition 'there exists a god or gods', on the grounds that he currently has no good reasons to do so.
While 'strong' Atheism may be accused of being somewhat of a metaphysical dogma, as it makes assertions concerning gods, the latter position makes no such assertions and thus cannot rightly be considered dogmatic or closed-minded.

Although it is often important to make judgments about (for example) whether one considers a 'supernatural' realm to exist or not, it is important to note that all human knowledge is ultimately fallible, thus there is no need to take such judgments as a kind of absolute truth.


For a final example: I am aware of various claims concerning the Christian God. An alleged big person outside the universe who hates it when people come to the wrong conclusion about his existence - in fact, he hates it so much he is willing to barbecue them for all eternity.

I see no reason to positively accept this claim about such an entity. This doesn't mean I am closed-minded or prejudiced about the existence of such a being, more like I require some better reasons and evidence before I assent to a belief in his existence.

As such, I can be 'open-minded' about the claim of his alleged existence without simply taking a counter-dogma as fact, or falling into the trap of fearing hell or divine judgment without good reasons for accepting such beliefs.

Rather, I have moved beyond the need for such simple-minded dogma altogether, and choose an approach to reality based on thought, not blind faith.

Top
#25530 - 06/09/09 10:24 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Meq]
Scarlett156 Offline
pledge


Registered: 05/20/09
Posts: 59
Loc: rural Eastern Colorado (USA)
 Quote:
I'm not sure what you mean by "hardcore materialism", but the upthrust of this video is...


I was not trying to be antagonistic. I always favor the rational argument, and applaud any common contribution to its strength.

I was not trying to explain the video. It (the video) is simplistic, and kind of entertaining. xoxo
_________________________
"I can fling poo gooder than u"

Top
#38452 - 05/12/10 02:55 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Scarlett156]
Gareth Offline
Banned
stranger


Registered: 05/02/10
Posts: 6

Top
#38484 - 05/12/10 09:45 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Gareth]
Nemesis Offline
senior member


Registered: 09/01/07
Posts: 2175
Loc: US
Gareth, if you can't provide an actual response to posts, instead of this copy and paste shit (the pictures of weed in another thread, and now a fucking Beastie Boys video), you can take a hike.

Newfags stay in Satanism 101.
_________________________
Nothing is sacred.

Top
#38491 - 05/13/10 03:22 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Nemesis]
Gareth Offline
Banned
stranger


Registered: 05/02/10
Posts: 6
 Originally Posted By: Nemesis
Gareth, if you can't provide an actual response to posts, instead of this copy and paste shit (the pictures of weed in another thread, and now a fucking Beastie Boys video), you can take a hike.

Newfags stay in Satanism 101.


that isn't marijuana it's alternative smokable herb, you need to learn punctuation and spelling retard.

Top
#38495 - 05/13/10 07:28 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Gareth]
Nemesis Offline
senior member


Registered: 09/01/07
Posts: 2175
Loc: US
And you need to learn some manners. Your own punctuation skills are called into question when you can't even be bothered to capitalize the first letter of your sentence, nor use a period in place of a comma to break up your run on sentence. Not to mention, stooping to the level of calling someone a retard. Your profile says you're 28? And yet you act like you're 18.

Have a nice life.
_________________________
Nothing is sacred.

Top
#38506 - 05/13/10 02:48 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Nemesis]
Adversary Offline
pledge


Registered: 02/19/10
Posts: 93
I view open-mindedness much the way Lawrence Krauss said it. That being, an open-mind is based on forcing your beliefs to conform to the evidence of reality.

Edited by Adversary (05/13/10 02:48 PM)

Top
#38586 - 05/15/10 08:19 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: fakepropht]
SubtleSatanist Offline
stranger


Registered: 05/10/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Nice video. What many of us believe to be common sense is often not for most.

 Originally Posted By: Meq
A 'strong' atheist asserts that there definitely is no god. A 'weak' atheist in contrast merely abstains from giving his assent or belief to the proposition 'there exists a god or gods', on the grounds that he currently has no good reasons to do so.


I would just like to add that Atheism is the lack of a belief in God, not the belief that there is no God. You can guess at a lot of other things about an Atheist but the only thing you can safely assume is that they lack a belief in God.

 Originally Posted By: Nemesis
Your profile says you're 28? And yet you act like you're 18.


I'm 18, and I can assure you that even my 12 year old sister has a higher maturity level than that of "Gareth."
_________________________
Veritas > Unitas > Caritas.

Top
#38589 - 05/15/10 09:10 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: SubtleSatanist]
Nemesis Offline
senior member


Registered: 09/01/07
Posts: 2175
Loc: US
 Originally Posted By: SubtleSatanist

 Originally Posted By: Nemesis
Your profile says you're 28? And yet you act like you're 18.


I'm 18, and I can assure you that even my 12 year old sister has a higher maturity level than that of "Gareth."


I've no doubt of it! We've had some younger members here that have put people in their 30's to shame. I only used the age of 18 as a reference point. As you well know, there are plenty of moronic 18 year olds, just as there are exceptionally bright ones. The typical 18 year olds tend to give their more intelligent peers a bad rep.

I always like to be pleasantly surprised. It keeps life interesting!
_________________________
Nothing is sacred.

Top
#38594 - 05/16/10 09:34 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: SubtleSatanist]
Phobos Offline
pledge


Registered: 05/04/10
Posts: 50
Loc: France
 Originally Posted By: SubtleSatanist
I would just like to add that Atheism is the lack of a belief in God, not the belief that there is no God. You can guess at a lot of other things about an Atheist but the only thing you can safely assume is that they lack a belief in God.


I disagree. By definition, an Atheist (a-theos, "without a god") denies the existence of God. This is an absolute notion. On the contrary, an agnostic (a-gnosis, "absence of knowledge") cannot pronounce himself and simply "lacks" faith.
_________________________
La République ne reconnaît, ne salarie ni ne subventionne aucun culte.

Top
#38596 - 05/16/10 10:13 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Phobos]
SubtleSatanist Offline
stranger


Registered: 05/10/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Ontario, Canada
 Originally Posted By: Phobos
I disagree. By definition, an Atheist (a-theos, "without a god") denies the existence of God. This is an absolute notion. On the contrary, an agnostic (a-gnosis, "absence of knowledge") cannot pronounce himself and simply "lacks" faith.


(a-theos, "without a god.") means just that, without a God. If theism is to uphold belief in a deity, then a-theism is to not uphold belief in a deity. But if we can't even define our own terms then there is little to talk about. Having said that, I'll just cite a couple definitions...

Atheism as defined on this website is as follows:
"The lack of theistic belief. Not believing in God or other deities."
http://www.the600club.com/encyclopedia/Atheism

Dictionary.com disappoints me.

On "Wiktionary" it defines Atheism as
"commonly described as the position that there are no deities.[1] It can also mean the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[2] A broader meaning is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.[3]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism

Atheism is not a "belief" in itself but a way in which to classify "belief," or a lack thereof. For example, LaVeyan Satanism is an atheistic religion, as is Buddhism (save the few sects that claim that the Buddha was/is a divine being) because they both lack a belief in a God.
_________________________
Veritas > Unitas > Caritas.

Top
#38597 - 05/16/10 10:26 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: SubtleSatanist]
Adversary Offline
pledge


Registered: 02/19/10
Posts: 93
I think we can agree Merriam-Webster is a reliable source?
Main Entry: athe·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈā-thē-ˌi-zəm\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French athéisme, from athée Atheist, from Greek atheos godless, from a- + theos god
Date: 1546
1 archaic : ungodliness, wickedness
2 a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity


Main Entry: 1ag·nos·tic
Pronunciation: \ag-ˈnäs-tik, əg-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek agnōstos unknown, unknowable, from a- + gnōstos known, from gignōskein to know — more at know
Date: 1869
1 : a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god
2 : a person unwilling to commit to an opinion about something

— ag·nos·ti·cism \-tə-ˌsi-zəm\ noun

To add to what is stated above, if people cannot use words for their definition, then we are speaking jibberish and there is no hope for communication.

Top
#38599 - 05/16/10 11:37 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Adversary]
Phobos Offline
pledge


Registered: 05/04/10
Posts: 50
Loc: France
 Originally Posted By: Adversary
I think we can agree Merriam-Webster is a reliable source?
Main Entry: athe·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈā-thē-ˌi-zəm\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French athéisme, from athée Atheist, from Greek atheos godless, from a- + theos god
Date: 1546
1 archaic : ungodliness, wickedness
2 a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity


Main Entry: 1ag·nos·tic
Pronunciation: \ag-ˈnäs-tik, əg-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek agnōstos unknown, unknowable, from a- + gnōstos known, from gignōskein to know — more at know
Date: 1869
1 : a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god
2 : a person unwilling to commit to an opinion about something

— ag·nos·ti·cism \-tə-ˌsi-zəm\ noun

To add to what is stated above, if people cannot use words for their definition, then we are speaking jibberish and there is no hope for communication.


I should have precised my referring to the Dictionnaire de l'Académie française which is, I guess, another reliable source too.
_________________________
La République ne reconnaît, ne salarie ni ne subventionne aucun culte.

Top
#38601 - 05/16/10 11:42 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Phobos]
Adversary Offline
pledge


Registered: 02/19/10
Posts: 93
Of course. I suppose it would differ a bit. People often misunderstand what the two are. Thank you for clrifying for me.
Top
#38602 - 05/16/10 11:43 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Adversary]
DemonicDaddy666 Offline
stranger


Registered: 05/12/10
Posts: 10
Loc: Alabama
Great video, thanks for sharing.
Top
#38615 - 05/16/10 08:39 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: SubtleSatanist]
SubtleSatanist Offline
stranger


Registered: 05/10/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Ontario, Canada
 Originally Posted By: Adversary
I think we can agree Merriam-Webster is a reliable source?
Main Entry: athe·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈā-thē-ˌi-zəm\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French athéisme, from athée Atheist, from Greek atheos godless, from a- + theos god
Date: 1546
1 archaic : ungodliness, wickedness
2 a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity


I care more for the content of the definition than I do the source. Normally, I would demand a reliable source for facts, but definitions are not facts, as they are often up for debate. Clearly, this source of definitions has it's prejudices. Anyone who describes Atheism as a doctrine, or wickedness, clearly has no idea what they are talking about and clearly doesn't care. If Atheism is the lack of a belief in God, than I would define agnosticism as either the belief that God's existence is either equiprobable (50/50), (or as withheld belief due to a lack of evidence) or a question beyond our understanding, Temporary Agnostic in Practice (TAP) or Permanent Agnostic in Practice (PAP) respectively. That said, I guess I would say that all agnostics are atheists, and some atheists are agnostics.
_________________________
Veritas > Unitas > Caritas.

Top
#38618 - 05/16/10 09:11 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: SubtleSatanist]
Adversary Offline
pledge


Registered: 02/19/10
Posts: 93
Yes, the words uses "on the street" are different than definitions can be. Regarding the reference of Atheism and wickedness was in relation to its archaic use.
Top
#38632 - 05/17/10 06:37 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: SubtleSatanist]
Phobos Offline
pledge


Registered: 05/04/10
Posts: 50
Loc: France
 Originally Posted By: SubtleSatanist
I care more for the content of the definition than I do the source. Normally, I would demand a reliable source for facts, but definitions are not facts, as they are often up for debate. Clearly, this source of definitions has it's prejudices. Anyone who describes atheism as a doctrine, or wickedness, clearly has no idea what they are talking about and clearly doesn't care. If atheism is the lack of a belief in God, than I would define agnosticism as either the belief that God's existence is either equiprobable (50/50), (or as withheld belief due to a lack of evidence) or a question beyond our understanding, Temporary Agnostic in Practice (TAP) or Permanent Agnostic in Practice (PAP) respectively. That said, I guess I would say that all agnostics are atheists, and some atheists are agnostics.


Words do not come from nowhere, they have origins, "roots". You can despise this idea because you are too lazy to learn but you cannot honestly pretend that all things are equivalent.
_________________________
La République ne reconnaît, ne salarie ni ne subventionne aucun culte.

Top
#38634 - 05/17/10 07:13 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Phobos]
SubtleSatanist Offline
stranger


Registered: 05/10/10
Posts: 12
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Should I even bother replying? Obviously many words only have one definition, but as I stated previously, many are up for debate. For example, your definition of a Christian may differ from a Christian's definition of a Christian. Likewise, your definition of an Atheist may differ from an Atheist's definition of an Atheist. This thread alone is proof of that. Too lazy to learn? That was low.
_________________________
Veritas > Unitas > Caritas.

Top
#49817 - 02/26/11 05:21 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Meq]
ktrapani16 Offline
stranger


Registered: 02/24/11
Posts: 11
since i'm a newbie i clicked on your thread and watched that video but i already knew most of that info accept for the part at 7:25 i didn't know critical thinking was compatible with open mindedness and that it empowers it and i also didn't know that
what u take and don't take into consideration is promoted by science. Thank you so much for indirectly helping me. :] HAIL SATAN!!!!!!

Top
#51795 - 03/27/11 06:22 AM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Nemesis]
SPEEDEMON Offline
stranger


Registered: 03/27/11
Posts: 35
Man I have never seen such an educational video before. I agree with ZephyrGirl, I should make my kids watch this too.
Top
#53795 - 05/01/11 02:09 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: SPEEDEMON]
Thule Offline
temp banned
pledge


Registered: 04/30/11
Posts: 68
spiritualism and magick are not scientific by nature and therefore it makes no sense to apply a scientific standard. We should apply a rational standard I suppose though.

For example science believes in observable results that can always be repeated. What if I can make a result happen 60% of the time- it is real, but its not scientific because it isn't consistent enough. Psychology is not a "hard science" itself, not subjected to the scientific method, but is real. Philosophy isn't science either.
_________________________
http://www.hraftzer.weebly.com

Top
#60871 - 11/02/11 03:12 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Thule]
Albert Cool Offline
banned for etc...
stranger


Registered: 11/02/11
Posts: 6
But just think what if magic and science combines.What could be the possibilities. I am quite influenced by The Sorcerer's Apprentice



Banned, great, another idiot influenced by a Disney cartoon... Morgan


Edited by Morgan (11/02/11 04:30 PM)
Edit Reason: banned after enough fail posts.
_________________________
yoga video

Top
#62351 - 12/07/11 07:41 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Meq]
kvac Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/29/11
Posts: 20
Loc: raleigh NC
Great vid on this topic. I think a lot of people miss the idea!


One line posts are frowned upon here... Morgan


Edited by Morgan (12/07/11 07:44 PM)
Edit Reason: warning/information
_________________________
halios

Top
#62377 - 12/08/11 12:40 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: kvac]
TillTheDayIDie Offline
stranger


Registered: 12/03/11
Posts: 23
I'll probably piss off a bunch of people by saying this, but my opinion is, you can't get knowledge of reality through empirical means. Science is useful on a practical level, but in my humble opinion, it just doesn't work as a descriptor of reality in all its comprehensiveness. Everything is always schematized. Any given view is always embedded in a perspective. Objectivity, I simply do not trust anymore and consider it a clever fiction.
Top
#63429 - 01/07/12 10:55 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Meq]
Luciferianhereti Offline
stranger


Registered: 12/23/11
Posts: 21
In conclusion, do not speak about your ghost(s) experiences, it won't lead you very far. I recognised myself a lot in that video, it made me laugh because it is truly a waste of time to talk about something you can't really prove. I am still going into houses where people want me to perform some sort of cleansing and I have to say that I saw much more than a shaking lamp. Still, I have no way to confirm with absolute conviction what I experienced.

Very informative video, I will try to remember and notice that pattern when I will discuss with someone.

Thanks for sharing.
_________________________
"You shall find your darkness stands on a thread of pinhole light"

Top
#65169 - 03/03/12 01:31 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Meq]
riasb Offline
stranger


Registered: 02/24/12
Posts: 18
Loc: New Hampshire
Thank you, my Liberal Art's Education schooled me in critical thinking. I am a new Follower of the Left handed path. I have over the last 3 years since the death of a dear brother 56 years old, I rejected my catholic lie, and was let to this knowing I was born into Satanism. catholics know the devil very early and we are slaves to guilt. I tore off the chains of religion, God is remote and christ never was god. I have been living a life of survival and I am here. Hail Satan.
_________________________
May Darkness comfort you. Hail Satan.

Top
#66874 - 05/22/12 03:03 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Meq]
Wilbur Offline
stranger


Registered: 03/16/12
Posts: 9
I could not agree more! Critical thinking is essential to being. However, if you want everyone to think critically or to think correctly then here is what you must do to cause change.

Destroy the structure that now is in place. Use violence. Only destruction can clear away the refuse of ignorance and reinstate a society of self thinkers.

This is obvious, I feel silly even posting it here.

You know this and yet you do nothing. Why?

Top
#74097 - 01/04/13 01:36 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Nemesis]
swaorlaf111 Offline
Banned
stranger


Registered: 12/20/12
Posts: 32
Loc: spokane, wa
There are several types of intelligences such as referenced by Howard Gardner: Visual-Spatial ,Bodily-kinesthetic ,Musical ,Interpersonal ,Intra-personal ,Linguistic ,Logical -Mathematical,Naturalist Intelligence and Existential Intelligence. Sixth sense intelligence is gaining ground as evidenced in the TV series Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman. The Hellenistic astronomers saw past the empirical standings of the their time that the world was flat but actually spherical. The imaginations of science fiction novels are today's technology. Whether atheistic Satanists find something they can not explain and theistic Satanists find something that is no longer a mystery is irrelevant. All intelligences should be employed ,if you are able to draw on them. One person may need empirical evidence and science to ground their understanding of the world in which we live. Another may need to step of f the regurgitated works of others to create new plausible ideas. This video is another example of epic academic failure and should have the warning to all who seek intelligence and knowledge -beware of confirmation bias. I personally would strive for this in my pursuit of knowledge, wisdom, life “I was like a boy playing on the sea-shore, and diverting myself now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me (Newton)”.
Top
#74876 - 01/26/13 09:12 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Draculesti]
Lucifershal0 Offline
stranger


Registered: 07/05/09
Posts: 18
Loc: Mt.Pleasant, SC
 Originally Posted By: Draculesti
I can't tell you how many times I've talked with a Christian (without coming right out and saying I'm a Satanist) and said that, "while I don't believe, I don't entirely discount the possibility of God; however, without empirical evidence to support his supposed existence I remain unconvinced." I have been met with "oh, he's out there; my prayers have been answered." As if that was a definitive argument for the affirmation of his existence. ;\)




If someone had stated "their prayers have been answered", wouldn't that just be a chance of luck or just chance itself? I swear some people just get stuck on believing in the J-man. I always had the impression if there was a god, a god who cherished everyone why wouldn't he end hunger and suffering? I can never get an educated answer to that question and I've been looking for one FOREVER.

Top
#74877 - 01/26/13 10:57 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Lucifershal0]
ceruleansteel Offline
active member


Registered: 10/15/07
Posts: 784
Loc: Behind you
People who want to believe will find proof everywhere.

It's as simple as that and unless someone attempts to approach it scientifically, they can just as easily find proof to support their disbelief. This holds true for anything (much like the argument that you can always find some statistic somewhere to back up your argument, no matter how outrageous it is).

Personally, I think that prayer is simply a focus of the mental will. For those who do not have the strength to hold themselves accountable for their own lives, they say they have prayed to god and god has answered (or sometimes "god chose a different path" for them). For those who are bold enough to be master of their own fate, they may call this "magic" or "self-hypnosis" even. It boils down to that old adage, "where there's a will, there's a way." If you are determined - and it does not defy physics or some other natural law - then you will find a way because your will - will be focused on that goal. If you are not truly dedicated to a goal, it doesn't matter how many gods you beg for help (including the self-god), it will not happen.

Top
#76384 - 05/17/13 01:32 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Meq]
realcommunity Offline
lurker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 1
Dear friends,

I want to state that the abrahamc religions are but a mass controll mechanism by energitic means, they penetrate into the deepest layers of mind and control people subliminally, there is actually a fact that all these institutions chridtianity and islam are of the same root, and meant to dumb and hold people down. we could overcome these problems with the help of each other.
please dont get offended or be deffensive this is an idea to ignore and destroy religions.

First post out of the Gate? (1 week ban)


Edited by xear (05/17/13 01:41 PM)
Edit Reason: Banned

Top
#77836 - 07/07/13 08:02 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: TillTheDayIDie]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 6517
Loc: Virginia
 Originally Posted By: TillTheDayIDie
I'll probably piss off a bunch of people by saying this, but my opinion is, you can't get knowledge of reality through empirical means. Science is useful on a practical level, but in my humble opinion, it just doesn't work as a descriptor of reality in all its comprehensiveness. Everything is always schematized. Any given view is always embedded in a perspective. Objectivity, I simply do not trust anymore and consider it a clever fiction.


It can be, I can say from personal experience I got caught up in that trap when I was a kid. If I couldn't use empirical means, then I'd be willing to dismiss something on that premise alone. In essence, I became closed-off to a lot of things. In time, you mature and grow, it's a process.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#81503 - 10/24/13 01:25 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Nemesis]
ms666 Offline
Banned
stranger


Registered: 09/03/13
Posts: 6
I enjoy the way truth is told.To have open-minded is the main way to see the Light that is in every one.Any time,we feel the presence of ourselves,we have to listen to ourselves in an universe of freedom.I agrre that a large open-minded is not very good.Life is us,make it as it sounds for us.we are the world.

D.

Top
#84562 - 01/29/14 11:22 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Meq]
Mr Hobbs Offline
stranger


Registered: 01/06/14
Posts: 27
Applause!! hello my name is Hobbs and I'm a closed minded baboon.... lol

I do see the point and agree with it. However do to the way society works its just not practical. for example If one person makes a supernatural claim and you proceed to counter already their is a defense of "how dare you challenge me". no the person is less likely to be receptive to any thing else especially when you are in front of an audience, No one wants to be made a fool.

So going about this is no easy task. Even if one were to listen to ones claims and then respond with prove your case, the most likely out come would be for the person to simply to brush it off or change the subject. because both of you know the claims are false, although making just a good conversation piece you now become the pin that popped the bubble.
There for removing you socially from the group or less likely to involve you in a future conversation.

Example: a bunch of coworkers are having a conversation about Aliens and you decide to stop and listen to your coworkers claims your also greeted by other coworkers and are welcomed into the conversation. This is a small but sure way that you are not an out cast and they approve of you and vouch for you being "one of the guys". So other names are on the line.

now listening to his alien /U.F.O story. You being the fucking Satanist that you are, never taking things of face value. Go into the scientific reality that intergalactic space travel while carrying Life forms, Explaining about cosmic radiation, Gasses, meteors, Solar flairs, and just traveling at the speed of light threw a vast un measurable space would most certainly be impossible.

Scientifically correct you now have just popped the bubble. The people around you are less likely to bring you into a conversation again thus hurting your social status. you'll be known as the know it all and probably be exiled from future conversations.

Now I know this because I've been placed as such at my job and with most of my friends. "As the one who just cant take anything on face value" or "Just loves to argue"

I have to admit it gives me a good feeling but it absolutely hurts my social status.

So speaking your mind and causing conflict isn't always the best thing to do all the time that could also be considered closed minded.

because knowing where you stand socially will determine weather or not their going to talk to you, To have an opinion.

just my thought.




Edited by Mr Hobbs (01/29/14 11:36 AM)

Top
#86315 - 04/06/14 06:27 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Mr Hobbs]
theharkonnen Offline
member


Registered: 12/03/13
Posts: 218
For your UFO case, I would argue that you are being closed-minded by not accepting the possibility of it being true. Improbable, yes. Impossible, no.

Indeed, one hundred years ago, no one could have ever thought that we would be living in a computer age like ours. Yet, we do and it has changed us in ways no one thought possible. In another hundred years, technology may make space flight much easier and much more probably. So, if we could potentially do it, it would be egotistical to think aliens could not.

Its like when Christianity first encountered the Chinese. Westerners could not conceive of these "Inferiors" surviving without Jesus. Yet, they did just well. Where there is a will, there is a way.

Of course, this is how I would argue it if I were a coworker of yours. Of course, to me, so what if aliens are real. It wouldn't really change much. I am not going to start being some alien-loving hippie. For me, the history channel focuses too much on aliens and pseudoscience and should focus more on - you know, history. This is probably why your coworkers are into it. My dad is the same way. I have yet to see a show about Prussia, or even China on that channel.


Edited by theharkonnen (04/06/14 06:30 PM)

Top
#112191 - 04/06/17 01:26 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Draculesti]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
 Originally Posted By: Draculesti
I can't tell you how many times I've talked with a Christian (without coming right out and saying I'm a Satanist) and said that, "while I don't believe, I don't entirely discount the possibility of God; however, without empirical evidence to support his supposed existence I remain unconvinced." I have been met with "oh, he's out there; my prayers have been answered." As if that was a definitive argument for the affirmation of his existence. ;\)


You're not all that educated are you? Sure you have devout imbeciles, but your perception of reality is really just a simulation. Every day physicists and philosophers are converting to the idea that reality is likely a simulation. Any true student of science would acknowledge the fact that any event would require some form of catalyst.

So what in your opinion is the catalyst for the big bang? Something came out of nothing then? How very unscientific of you. People of lower intelligence tend to claim that they believe what science says, science is just a single tool, not everything can be defined scientifically, thus your perception is every bit as narrow-minded as Amish people's. Atheists such as yourself, tend to be equally as idiotic as the christians you love to hate. Science does not confirm Atheism, in fact it's always been agnostic, and as it currently stands it's gotten off the fence and started moving in the direction of the numinous.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112192 - 04/06/17 01:31 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Adversary]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
 Originally Posted By: Adversary
I view open-mindedness much the way Lawrence Krauss said it. That being, an open-mind is based on forcing your beliefs to conform to the evidence of reality.


So you're a follower with a low IQ? You could have picked more flattering idol, but then again, you are a common piece of garbage, I should not have expected any less from one such as yourself.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112193 - 04/06/17 01:33 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: TillTheDayIDie]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
 Originally Posted By: TillTheDayIDie
I'll probably piss off a bunch of people by saying this, but my opinion is, you can't get knowledge of reality through empirical means. Science is useful on a practical level, but in my humble opinion, it just doesn't work as a descriptor of reality in all its comprehensiveness. Everything is always schematized. Any given view is always embedded in a perspective. Objectivity, I simply do not trust anymore and consider it a clever fiction.


Good point.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112194 - 04/06/17 01:36 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: riasb]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
 Originally Posted By: riasb
Thank you, my Liberal Art's Education schooled me in critical thinking. I am a new Follower of the Left handed path. I have over the last 3 years since the death of a dear brother 56 years old, I rejected my catholic lie, and was let to this knowing I was born into Satanism. catholics know the devil very early and we are slaves to guilt. I tore off the chains of religion, God is remote and christ never was god. I have been living a life of survival and I am here. Hail Satan.


Your liberal arts education? You studied art history or gender studies? What a loser... Were you too stupid to study science or engineering? Don't brag about liberal arts education, it's like flaunting a low IQ.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112195 - 04/06/17 01:39 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: SIN3]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
 Originally Posted By: SIN3
 Originally Posted By: TillTheDayIDie
I'll probably piss off a bunch of people by saying this, but my opinion is, you can't get knowledge of reality through empirical means. Science is useful on a practical level, but in my humble opinion, it just doesn't work as a descriptor of reality in all its comprehensiveness. Everything is always schematized. Any given view is always embedded in a perspective. Objectivity, I simply do not trust anymore and consider it a clever fiction.


Let's all take advice from the butch lesbian that lives in poverty people, because that's who we want to be right?

It can be, I can say from personal experience I got caught up in that trap when I was a kid. If I couldn't use empirical means, then I'd be willing to dismiss something on that premise alone. In essence, I became closed-off to a lot of things. In time, you mature and grow, it's a process.



_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112196 - 04/06/17 01:40 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: theharkonnen]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
 Originally Posted By: theharkonnen
For your UFO case, I would argue that you are being closed-minded by not accepting the possibility of it being true. Improbable, yes. Impossible, no.

Indeed, one hundred years ago, no one could have ever thought that we would be living in a computer age like ours. Yet, we do and it has changed us in ways no one thought possible. In another hundred years, technology may make space flight much easier and much more probably. So, if we could potentially do it, it would be egotistical to think aliens could not.

Its like when Christianity first encountered the Chinese. Westerners could not conceive of these "Inferiors" surviving without Jesus. Yet, they did just well. Where there is a will, there is a way.

Of course, this is how I would argue it if I were a coworker of yours. Of course, to me, so what if aliens are real. It wouldn't really change much. I am not going to start being some alien-loving hippie. For me, the history channel focuses too much on aliens and pseudoscience and should focus more on - you know, history. This is probably why your coworkers are into it. My dad is the same way. I have yet to see a show about Prussia, or even China on that channel.


I've tried to get this point across many times to these Atheist peasants, it never works, stop trying. I love Dune by the way.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112200 - 04/06/17 04:00 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Ubermensch23]
Dimitri Offline
stalker


Registered: 07/13/08
Posts: 3063
Reality as a simulation is a bad theory.
It switches "god" with higher sentient fallibility.
It switches "God" towards a human hand.

Granted there's a few advantages and few entertaining philosophical statements that can be made, but it isn't a better shortcut to end the debate. Just another branch on the tree so to speak.

 Originally Posted By: Ubermensch23
Any true student of science would acknowledge the fact that any event would require some form of catalyst.

That would be more or less true in a highly speculative and down-graded view.
Reality paints it slightly different but for the sake of argument we'll follow it through.

The thing is, a student of science will also recognize that, even if there is a need for some catalyst, an action or event can be random. The student studies the workings of the catalyst and the interaction. The "how" it went and "why" it went sometimes has to take a backseat.

 Originally Posted By: Ubermensch23
Atheists such as yourself, tend to be equally as idiotic as the christians you love to hate. Science does not confirm atheism, in fact it's always been agnostic, and as it currently stands it's gotten off the fence and started moving in the direction of the numinous.

Atheist or theist or... is but a stance. Dissected and looked upon more closely, both can indeed be considered as equal in a philosophical sense.

It just depends on what is more convenient to live with.
While popular Atheism will define science as Agnostic, it merely is as you said: a tool. A tool does not take stances upon religious matters and can only be used to perform work.



Edited by Dimitri (04/06/17 04:01 PM)
_________________________
Ut vivat, crescat et floreat

Top
#112221 - 04/07/17 04:31 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Ubermensch23]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 6517
Loc: Virginia
 Originally Posted By: Ubermensch23
 Originally Posted By: SIN3
[quote=TillTheDayIDie]I'll probably piss off a bunch of people by saying this, but my opinion is, you can't get knowledge of reality through empirical means. Science is useful on a practical level, but in my humble opinion, it just doesn't work as a descriptor of reality in all its comprehensiveness. Everything is always schematized. Any given view is always embedded in a perspective. Objectivity, I simply do not trust anymore and consider it a clever fiction.


Let's all take advice from the butch lesbian that lives in poverty people, because that's who we want to be right?

It can be, I can say from personal experience I got caught up in that trap when I was a kid. If I couldn't use empirical means, then I'd be willing to dismiss something on that premise alone. In essence, I became closed-off to a lot of things. In time, you mature and grow, it's a process.





I am neither a Butch Lesbian nor am I in poverty but hey by all means listen to this doofus that still can't figure out how to use the quote feature here. This guy is a fucking genius.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#112248 - 04/09/17 06:42 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: SIN3]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
You're either a bald butch lesbian in denial, or a transsexual that drifted towards this site because you were a social outcast. Your picture is not flattering in the least, only a person who received special education would blatantly expose such a hideous thing. Keep doing your little podcast to convince yourself you're relevant, peasant.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112249 - 04/09/17 07:01 PM Re: Open-Mindedness? [Re: Dimitri]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
Ever heard of the Triadic Dimensional-Distinction Vortical Paradigm? Now I must confess, I'm not a Physicist myself, I'm studying Computer Science and Chemistry, however I do have interests related to Physics, and this paradigm is something I have taken an interest in.

Obviously when people say simulation, we're not necessarily referring to a computer simulation, then again you probably know that, but I simply mean to imply that consciousness might truly underlie consciousness. Another debatable subject in regards to consciousness, is whether it is a product of the brain, some say it is, some say it is not. However, if consciousness is not a product of the brain, then you should admit how interesting the implications are.

Our brain might simply be an interpreter of signals, and our perception might simply be the result of our limited senses and our limited capacity for reason resulting in the current interpretation that constitutes reality. Now if I may make a comparison between ourselves and older species of worms so as to illustrate the extent to which senses affect our perception, older species of worms had only two senses, sight was not one of them, therefor they could not perceive light. Now if you were to suggest to a person without sight that light exists, he'd probably think you insane. I make this comparison in the attempt to articulate to you that what we perceive might not necessarily be absolute, but could change depending upon our range of senses.

Thus far we have only enhanced the senses we already have, for example microscopes and telescopes. I believe that should we expand our range of senses, our perception will thus completely change. Distance for example might only exist because we have no other way of interpreting these frequencies our brains tune into. Obviously we would need to replace the brain with a far superior model too. What say you in regards to this subject?


Edited by Ubermensch23 (04/09/17 07:33 PM)
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112262 - 04/10/17 09:25 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Ubermensch23]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 6517
Loc: Virginia
 Originally Posted By: Ubermensch23
You're either a bald butch lesbian in denial, or a transsexual that drifted towards this site because you were a social outcast. Your picture is not flattering in the least, only a person who received special education would blatantly expose such a hideous thing. Keep doing your little podcast to convince yourself you're relevant, peasant.


You seem to think so, yet hold no knowledge that I haven't done a podcast in over a year. You don't like my blog? Then don't listen to the thing, no one is holding a gun to your head.

Show me your photo and we can talk about flattery. I think you're the one in denial, each post you make to me or about me, are wooden nickles on my altar.

Keep Calm and Keep Worshiping Me.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#112265 - 04/10/17 09:54 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Ubermensch23]
Oxus Offline
member


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 506
Yeah, I dunno about any of that, I think she's kinda hot and funky.
Top
#112287 - 04/11/17 10:06 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Ubermensch23]
Dan_Dread Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/08/08
Posts: 3753
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
Although her hairstyle may not be everyone's cup of tea, the giant tits certainly make up for it.

I'm not nominally a titty guy, but I'd tear that up.
_________________________
ADM
ideological vandal

Top
#112289 - 04/11/17 10:41 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Dan_Dread]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 6517
Loc: Virginia
Never have so many tripped over a hair cut.





All a matter of preference I suppose. I hate beards.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#112339 - 04/14/17 06:28 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: SIN3]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
SIN3 is fat and old, sorry, but you've reached your expiration date, and look at your belly, don't you do cardio? I don't post my picture because I'm well aware of the implications of exposing myself on the Internet. People who wear their hearts on their sleeves are generally people of low intelligence, such as yourself, who don't realize how easy you make it for people to target you personally, I bet you even have a facebook account.

You buy your little Transylvania t-shirts and your pentagrams, keep telling yourself you're a legitimate person. You're clearly a very big poser, like the metalheads that think black metal is about corpse-paint, and the wiggers also bred in your pathetic society. The reason you feel you have to dress and act like that in the first place is because you subconsciously realize that you're a poser. It's kind of how skinheads compare to the SS, none of them had tattoos or believed in similar ideals compared to skinheads. Posers will be posers I guess.

I've had extensive experience with people such as yourself in my life, which is why I dislike you, I could tell from your posts and your picture that you were like them. You're like those kids that got picked on in primary school, so when you went to high school you started listening to rock and metal so as to appear powerful to those who would seek to pick on you, kind of like a Puffer Fish.

I always hated people like those because they ruin the subcultures they infiltrate, metal is a great example, so is the Left-Hand path. You make everybody else think that the LHP is for social rejects, nerds, and fat people, because weak people like you gravitate towards this way of life to hide from your own weakness. Maybe elitism isn't something you approve of, but the difference is you disapprove of elitism because you can't achieve a state of being that is considered worthy of the elite, whereas I disapprove of being a fat poser, such as yourself, because even though I could eat myself fat and be lazy, it's so much more satisfactory to look down upon people like you because I'm physically superior.


Edited by Ubermensch23 (04/14/17 06:55 PM)
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112342 - 04/14/17 06:53 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Dan_Dread]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
 Originally Posted By: Dan_Dread
Although her hairstyle may not be everyone's cup of tea, the giant tits certainly make up for it.

I'm not nominally a titty guy, but I'd tear that up.


Yip, those nice saggy tits... Dude you must be really old. Women lose their value once they hit 33, after that they become feminists because nobody wants to pay for them on dates anymore, unless they're beta males losers with small cocks.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112366 - 04/17/17 12:09 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Ubermensch23]
SIN3 Offline
stalker


Registered: 05/14/13
Posts: 6517
Loc: Virginia
 Originally Posted By: Ubermensch23
SIN3 is fat and old, sorry, but you've reached your expiration date, and look at your belly, don't you do cardio?


In contrast to what? Continue to Pontificate on the matter. I have no interest in you, your background or why you seem rather obsessed with my person. At best it's entertainment and at worst, there could be other topics I could use my post on.

 Quote:
I don't post my picture because I'm well aware of the implications of exposing myself on the Internet.


Times are hard in SA, it seems. You don't seem too concerned with your IP and tools at any person's disposal to unmask you. I don't know what you're so paranoid about anyway, who gives a shit about you or what you do on the Internet?


 Quote:
People who wear their hearts on their sleeves are generally people of low intelligence, such as yourself, who don't realize how easy you make it for people to target you personally, I bet you even have a facebook account.


Heart on my sleeve? Ok Bro, you're out of touch but you seem to think you have it all worked out. So what if I do, what business is that of yours? People with low intelligence tend to harp on surface issues like outer appearance and social media. You're so far removed from what an Overman is, an admin should just strip you of that username for funsies. Just to watch you have a melt down.

 Quote:
You buy your little Transylvania t-shirts and your pentagrams,


You don't like Tim Burton films? So fucking what, are you educated? You don't seem to know what the most inane things are. What pentagrams are you referring to?

 Quote:
keep telling yourself you're a legitimate person.


What legitimizes personhood? Don't you live in a third world armpit, hiding from the Internet boogeyman? What makes you an authority on legitimization? DO TELL. I'd love to hear it.

 Quote:
You're clearly a very big poser, like the metalheads that think black metal is about corpse-paint, and the wiggers also bred in your pathetic society. The reason you feel you have to dress and act like that in the first place is because you subconsciously realize that you're a poser. It's kind of how skinheads compare to the SS, none of them had tattoos or believed in similar ideals compared to skinheads. Posers will be posers I guess.


Unlike you that hides from Fingermen and probably still live with your parents. Ok DoOd.

 Quote:
I've had extensive experience with people such as yourself in my life, which is why I dislike you, I could tell from your posts and your picture that you were like them. You're like those kids that got picked on in primary school, so when you went to high school you started listening to rock and metal so as to appear powerful to those who would seek to pick on you, kind of like a Puffer Fish.

I always hated people like those because they ruin the subcultures they infiltrate, metal is a great example, so is the Left-Hand path. You make everybody else think that the LHP is for social rejects, nerds, and fat people, because weak people like you gravitate towards this way of life to hide from your own weakness. Maybe elitism isn't something you approve of, but the difference is you disapprove of elitism because you can't achieve a state of being that is considered worthy of the elite, whereas I disapprove of being a fat poser, such as yourself, because even though I could eat myself fat and be lazy, it's so much more satisfactory to look down upon people like you because I'm physically superior.



You sound like an angsty teenager that hasn't matured. You read rather ridiculous, I think we're done here.
_________________________
SINJONES.com

Top
#112379 - 04/17/17 05:07 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: SIN3]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
You never denied that you were a fat bitch way past her expiration date though, thus you clearly acknowledge the fact. My point being that nobody wants to see ugly fat women, if we wanted to look at women, we would look at attractive women, which you are not, and thus you should feel shame for exposing yourself without regards to your appearance. Don't you know that women are just objects designed for our leisure? Once you're fat, old, and your vagina starts dropping to the floor every time you take off your granny panties, then you're no longer of any importance, so fuck off.

Yes I do live in a third world country, which is beneficial to perspective and individuality. We don't have communist agenda taught to us since a young age, as is the case as far as you are concerned, which is why you feel no shame for being an obese bitch with no education. The worst thing people can be in your society is a racist, in my society everyone is a racist. America isn't far from becoming a third world country itself, give it another decade or two until your liberal values allow blacks and Hispanics to ruin your country. You'll probably reply about blacks and Hispanics aren't ruining your country, exactly as programmed. You're a proud little fat bitch, aren't you?

You assume that my situation in regards to internet privacy is identical to your own? Wrong. My country's intelligence community under black leadership is half a century behind, thus internet privacy is pretty much guaranteed. This is not the case in your country, since every day more ISPs are admitting that they track your internet usage, not to mention backdoors in Windows and Mac, which is why I use Linux. Our predicaments are vastly different, it's beyond comparison really. The notion that you seem to have is that you're safe because you're a nobody, which is very wrong indeed, you simply lack the intuition to foresee what your tardiness could cause. Since you're an old cunt who probably has little more than a high school education from the 80s, I can see why you're so relaxed. Educated people take precautions, uneducated persons such as yourself tend to criticize those who take precautions because you're too dimwitted to realize how dangerous the internet really is.

I mean, your government did conduct illegal experiments on hippies, in what was termed MK Ultra right? I'd be very concerned if I were you, especially since you're such a vocal satanic poser. Say the situation in your country changes radically in the next few decades, worst case scenario next few years, and in this period Christians start to kill off all the non-Christians in America. They use information collected for the government by your ISPs in conjunction with algorithms to determine whether you are or ever have been opposed to their way of life. What happens to you then fat girl? Would you like to be some stupid martyr for your little cause? Any society that takes measures to become a utopia, eventually becomes a dystopia, history proves this. Your society has no balance at this moment in time, and because of that you will probably experience civil war, nobody goes down willingly, unfortunately for people like you the Christians are the most organized out of all of the factions in your country, and you're the type of person they'd love to get their hands on, but that's if this dystopia comes to pass.

Prevention and caution are logical things, after all, you use protection during sex to reduce the risk of contracting stds, not because there is certainty that your partner has it, but because of the possibility of your partner having it. You're a woman, you don't understand logic, you're a cognitively-inferior being that bases her arguments on emotions and societal dogma.

The living with your parents insult is so typically American, no originality. And no, housing is pretty cheap where I'm from, so I'm pretty sure I don't live with my parents anymore. You resort to assuming such a thing, because you subconsciously associate that with failure. The reason you felt like portraying me as a failure because you realized what I said about you was absolutely correct, and thus you sought to justify your failure as a being by seeking solidarity.

No, I don't watch Tim Burton films, in fact I've never even heard of him until your post mentioned him specifically. Your pride as an American is kind of puzzling to be honest, seeing as your first world status was built on white supremacy and the systematic oppression of women and minorities, which is something you clearly oppose. This creates an oxymoron of sorts, because you boast of your nations superior status to mine, and yet it became a first world nation under white supremacists and misogynists, I guess you're too dumb to realize how strange that seems.


Edited by Ubermensch23 (04/17/17 05:12 PM)
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
#112434 - 04/19/17 11:49 AM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Ubermensch23]
Czereda Offline
senior member


Registered: 03/14/11
Posts: 1703
Loc: Poland
I wonder man what's wrong with you. I read most of your posts and still your psychology is a mystery to me. It's so confounding. I can't make any sense of this looney melody.

Beauty is in the eye of a beholder. I know plenty of women who are far from beauty queens but still have their loyal admirers. Nothing wrong in showing your body if you feel like it. Your post altogether reeks of inferiority complex.

For a long time I also didn't want to show my photos online but finally decided to post a few on Facebook. Nobody came to shoot me. You take more risks in your daily life. How can you be sure that in spite of all the precautions taken you ain't hit by a car on your way to work or robbed, or shot, or killed slowly by cancer?
_________________________
Anna Czereda
O9A Meme Cat

Top
#112465 - 04/21/17 06:56 PM Re: Open-Mindedness and Critical Thinking [Re: Czereda]
Ubermensch23 Offline
member


Registered: 03/11/14
Posts: 131
Loc: Pretoria, South Africa
So you don't wear condoms? You don't take medicine when sick? You take precautions to mitigate risks, that's called common sense.

Also, I don't give a fuck about the fact that you're stupid enough to expose yourself on the Internet. You do that because you're desperate for approval you don't get in person. The reason people don't criticize you is because of liberal culture, nobody wants to see fat women with saggy tits and vaginas, stop lying to yourself you fucking communist.
_________________________
"0" is the past, "1" is the future. "Now" is nowhere.

Top
Page all of 5 12345>


Moderator:  Woland, TV is God, fakepropht, SkaffenAmtiskaw, Asmedious, Fist 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.07 seconds of which 0.003 seconds were spent on 78 queries. Zlib compression disabled.