Page all of 3 123>
Topic Options
#39510 - 06/23/10 05:30 AM Jung personality test
Clicks Offline
member


Registered: 06/14/10
Posts: 114
Loc: New Orleans
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp

Take this personality test and post your results please.

I know most people, as I do, look down on internet personality tests, however I think this could have interesting results.

I expect most people here should end up an INTP, as I did. Please try to answer it as truthfully as possible.

Thank you for your time.
_________________________
Join your local Wizards' Association today!

Top
#39513 - 06/23/10 07:56 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
Meq Offline
Banned
active member


Registered: 08/28/07
Posts: 861
While I don't consider the Jung-Myers-Briggs typology to be truly scientific, it can still produce interesting results. Just take it with a pinch of salt.


Here are the results I got from this test - they have varied slightly on other tests in the past:

Your Type is: INTJ - Rational Mastermind

Strength of the preferences %
Introverted: 100%
Intuitive: 25%
Thinking: 88%
Judging: 22%

Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:
Very expressed introvert
Moderately expressed intuitive personality
Very expressed thinking personality
Slightly expressed judging personality

My ideal career path is described as Computer Programming, Natural Science or Engineering.


Any Extroverts or Feeling types here?


Meq

Top
#39516 - 06/23/10 09:37 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
Nemesis Offline
senior member


Registered: 09/01/07
Posts: 2175
Loc: US
I've taken this one before, and while one test site gave me the result of ENTJ, I just took it a third time and it confirmed my initial result: INTJ

Introverted: 22%
Intuitive: 50%
Thinking: 50%
Judging: 1%

slightly expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality

Basically, I'm fairly social when I want to be, otherwise I keep my thoughts to myself. Unless I'm venting about something.

The description of Rational Women fits me right on.

"Rational women tend to be late bloomers on the dating scene. They are sometimes unaware of or don't wish to follow cultural norms which dictate what is considered feminine. As they get older, men often appreciate their logic and general lack of emotional outbursts, along with the fact that Rational women tend to clearly state what they think and want."

Damn, I'm so sexy.
_________________________
Nothing is sacred.

Top
#39519 - 06/23/10 11:45 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Nemesis]
felixgarnet Offline
active member


Registered: 10/17/09
Posts: 688
Loc: UK
I'm an ENFJ. Intuitive and quite judgemental (I just know if someone's guilty of something, so I'd be a bugger at Jury Service. ;\)
Suggested career options of Education and Counselling were spot on.
_________________________
"Here's to Artifice!" - Anton Szandor LaVey.

Top
#39520 - 06/23/10 11:50 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Nemesis]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
INTJ

Introverted: 44%
Intuitive: 62%
Thinking: 62%
Judging: 44%

Yes or No sure doesn't feel like a good option on some questions.

D.

Top
#39521 - 06/23/10 12:00 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: felixgarnet]
Jake999 Offline
senior member


Registered: 11/02/08
Posts: 2230
ESTJ

Early Stage Thermonuclear Justice
_________________________
Bury your dead, pick up your weapon and soldier on.


Top
#39522 - 06/23/10 01:02 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Meq]
Fnord Offline
senior member


Registered: 01/11/10
Posts: 2085
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Meq

Any Extroverts or Feeling types here?


Guilty on one count. INFP

89% very expressed introvert
50% moderately expressed intuitive personality
12% slightly expressed feeling personality
44% moderately expressed perceiving personality

From what I've read, about 90% of the personality type is accurate to me.
_________________________
Dead and gone. Syonara.

Top
#39524 - 06/23/10 01:58 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Fnord]
6Satan6Archist6 Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2509
INTJ

33% Introverted
25% Intuitive
38% Thinking
1% Judging

moderately expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality

"When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know."

Check

"personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness."

Seems about right.
_________________________
No gods. No masters.

Top
#39528 - 06/23/10 03:10 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Diavolo]
Nemesis Offline
senior member


Registered: 09/01/07
Posts: 2175
Loc: US
 Originally Posted By: Diavolo

Yes or No sure doesn't feel like a good option on some questions.

D.


I thought the same thing. At lease a dozen questions I could have answered either way, depending upon the situation at hand. Ah well!

Re: Jake
 Quote:
ESTJ

Early Stage Thermonuclear Justice


Haha! Too right!
_________________________
Nothing is sacred.

Top
#39529 - 06/23/10 03:34 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Nemesis]
Zophos Offline
member


Registered: 03/28/10
Posts: 115
Loc: U.S.A.
INTP — The Architect

Introverted: 100%
Intuitive: 89%
Thinking: 95%
Perceiving: 79%


"INTPs exhibit the greatest precision in thought and language of all the types; they tend to see distinctions and inconsistencies in thought and language instantaneously. The one word which captures the unique style of INTPs is architect—the architect of ideas and systems as well as the architect of edifices. This type is found in only 1 percent of the population and therefore is not encountered as frequently as some of the other types. INTPs detect contradictions in statements no matter how distant in space or time the contradictory statements were produced. The intellectual scanning of INTPs has a principled quality; that is, INTPs search for whatever is relevant and pertinent to the issue at hand. Consequently, INTPs can concentrate better than any other type.

Authority derived from office, position, or wide acceptance does not impress INTPs. Only statements that are logical and coherent carry weight. External authority per se is irrelevant. INTPs abhor redundancy and incoherence. Possessing a desire to understand the universe, an INTP is constantly looking for natural law. Curiosity concerning these keys to the universe is a driving force in this type. INTPs prize intelligence in themselves and in others, but can become intellectual dilletantes as a result of their need to amass ideas, principles, or understanding of behavior. And once they know something, it is remembered. INTPs can become obsessed with analysis. Once caught up in a thought process, that thought process seems to have a will of its own for INTPs, and they persevere until the issue is comprehended in all its complexity. They can be intellectual snobs and may show impatience at times with others less endowed intellectually. This quality, INTPs find, generates hostility and defensive behaviors on the part of others, who may describe an INTP as arrogant.

For INTPs, the world exists primarily to be understood. Reality is trivial, a mere arena for proving ideas. It is essential that the universe is understood and that whatever is stated about the universe is stated correctly, with coherence and without redundancy. This is the INTP's final purpose. It matters not whether others understand or accept his or her truths. The INTP is the logician, the mathematician, the philosopher, the scientist; any pursuit requiring architecture of ideas intrigues this type. INTPs should not, however, be asked to work out the implementation or application of their models to the real world. The INTP is the architect of a system and leaves it to others to be the builder and the applicator. Very often, therefore, the INTP's work is not credited to him or her. The builder and the applier gains fame and fortune, while the INTP's name remains obscure. Appreciation of an INTP's theoretical work frequently comes posthumously—or the work may never be removed from library shelves at all and thus lost.

INTPs deal with the environment primarily through intuition, and their strongest quality, the thinking function, remains relatively hidden except in close associations. Therefore, INTPs are often misunderstood, seen as difficult to know, and seldom perceived at their true level of competency. They are inclined to be shy except when with close friends, and their reserve is difficult to penetrate. They are very adaptable until one of their principles is violated. Then INTPs are not adaptable at all! They may have difficulty in being understood by others because they tend to think in a complicated fashion and want to be precise, never redundant in their communications. Because their feeling qualities may be underdeveloped, they may be insensitive to the wants and wishes of others, often quite unaware of the existence of these wants and wishes.
" (excerpted from Source)


Z.
_________________________
Nihil sit tam infirmum aut instabile quam fama potentiae non sua vi nita.

Top
#39531 - 06/23/10 06:37 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Diavolo]
Clicks Offline
member


Registered: 06/14/10
Posts: 114
Loc: New Orleans
It seems we've got a decently varied crowd here, based on what this test can show (which isn't much).

 Originally Posted By: Diavolo
INTJ

Yes or No sure doesn't feel like a good option on some questions.

D.


Agreed. As I was taking the test and pondering the answers I would think "Sometimes, but given the details of a situation maybe..."

I like taking these tests every once in a while to see how accurate they can get, but I never expect too much out of them, especially from ones that only offer yes or no answers. There's too much to analyze to be able to give a truly accurate test. Still fun though. When you get a personallity description that seems to fit you decently you get that little moment of, "Oh teehee! That's me!"
_________________________
Join your local Wizards' Association today!

Top
#39536 - 06/23/10 09:30 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
zippadydooda Offline
pledge


Registered: 08/09/09
Posts: 61
Loc: San Diego, California
Introverted 33% moderately expressed introvert
Intuitive 75% distinctively expressed intuitive personality
Thinking 50% moderately expressed thinking personality
Judging 1% slightly expressed judging personality

Corporative Lawyer is my intention, and it's nice to be told I would be good at that, whether or not it means anything coming from a computer program.
_________________________
Blathering nonsense.

Top
#39540 - 06/23/10 10:41 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: zippadydooda]
Morgan Offline
Princess of Hell
stalker


Registered: 08/29/07
Posts: 2956
Loc: New York City
Rational Field Marshal Personality

Extraverted: 1%
Intuitive: 62%
Thinking: 50%
Judging: 44%

Not completely sold on those numbers but the other stuff seems interesting, and some on point:

Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition it is marshaling or situational organizing role that reaches the highest development in the Fieldmarshal. As this kind of role is practiced some contingency organizing is necessary, so that the second suit of the Fieldmarshal's intellect is devising contingency plans. Structural and functional engineering, though practiced in some degree in the course of organizational operations, tend to be not nearly as well developed and are soon outstripped by the rapidly growing skills in organizing. But it must be said that any kind of strategic exercise tends to bring added strength to engineering as well as organizing skills.

Hardly more than two percent of the total population, Fieldmarshals are bound to lead others, and from an early age they can be observed taking command of groups. In some cases, they simply find themselves in charge of groups, and are mystified as to how this happened. But the reason is that they have a strong natural urge to give structure and direction wherever they are - to harness people in the field and to direct them to achieve distant goals. They resemble Supervisors in their tendency to establish plans for a task, enterprise, or organization, but Fieldmarshals search more for policy and goals than for regulations and procedures.

They cannot not build organizations, and cannot not push to implement their goals. When in charge of an organization, whether in the military, business, education, or government, Fieldmarshals more than any other type desire (and generally have the ability) to visualize where the organization is going, and they seem able to communicate that vision to others. Their organizational and coordinating skills tends to be highly developed, which means that they are likely to be good at systematizing, ordering priorities, generalizing, summarizing, at marshaling evidence, and at demonstrating their ideas. Their ability to organize, however, may be more highly developed than their ability to analyze, and the Fieldmarshal leader may need to turn to an Inventor or Architect to provide this kind of input.

Fieldmarshals will usually rise to positions of responsibility and enjoy being executives. They are tireless in their devotion to their jobs and can easily block out other areas of life for the sake of their work. Superb administrators in any field - medicine, law, business, education, government, the military - Fieldmarshals organize their units into smooth-functioning systems, planning in advance, keeping both short-term and long-range objectives well in mind. For the Fieldmarshal, there must always be a goal-directed reason for doing anything, and people's feelings usually are not sufficient reason. They prefer decisions to be based on impersonal data, want to work from well thought-out plans, like to use engineered operations - and they expect others to follow suit. They are ever intent on reducing bureaucratic red tape, task redundancy, and aimless confusion in the workplace, and they are willing to dismiss employees who cannot get with the program and increase their efficiency.

Although Fieldmarshals are tolerant of established procedures, they can and will abandon any procedure when it can be shown to be ineffective in accomplishing its goal. Fieldmarshals root out and reject ineffectiveness and inefficiency, and are impatient with repetition of error.

Morgan
_________________________
Courage Conquering Fear
Fuck em if they can't take a joke
Don't Like What I Say, Kiss My Ass



Top
#39542 - 06/24/10 03:31 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Morgan]
Wake Offline
pledge


Registered: 11/11/09
Posts: 93
Loc: Australia
INTP
Introverted:22%
Intuitive: 62%
Thinking: 62%
Perceiving: 56%

# slightly expressed introvert
# distinctively expressed intuitive personality
# distinctively expressed thinking personality
# moderately expressed perceiving personality
_________________________
To love a stranger, one's love must be cheap

Top
#39546 - 06/24/10 12:29 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
Damis Offline
pledge


Registered: 12/10/08
Posts: 60
Loc: England
Did this a long time ago, I got:

ISTJ

Introverted 67
Sensing 12
thinking 38
judging 22

I liked the first paragraph of the ISTJ portrait,

"As an ISTJ, your primary mode of living is focused internally, where you take things in via your five senses in a literal, concrete fashion. Your secondary mode is external, where you deal with things rationally and logically."


Edited by Damis (06/24/10 12:37 PM)
Edit Reason: addendum
_________________________
Leben ist krieg.

Top
#39547 - 06/24/10 03:08 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Damis]
Phobos Offline
pledge


Registered: 05/04/10
Posts: 50
Loc: France
"Jesus tittiefucking Christ : Your Type is INTJ (Mastermind™) !!"

Introverted : 89 (You are socially retarded.)
Intuitive : 38 (At least as much as a beetle.)
Thinking : 88 (You're so boring, you've got plenty of time to do so.)
Judging : 22 (Who cares of what you think anywayz?)


"You are so cool and brilliant that anybody within your circle of acquaintances worships you. You are everybody's bestest friend.
No, just kidding. You are an arrogant frog and the world despises you at least as much as you despise it. Go f* yourself and die in pain.
"

-Herr Jung
_________________________
La République ne reconnaît, ne salarie ni ne subventionne aucun culte.

Top
#39555 - 06/25/10 06:55 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
Anne Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/25/09
Posts: 30
Loc: Denmark
Your Type is ISTP

56 Introverted
38 Sensing
12 Thinking
44 Perceiving

moderately expressed introvert
moderately expressed sensing personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality

Guess I set a poor examble of being satanist O.o
_________________________
There is no heaven, there is no hell, except here on earth.. - Anton LaVey

Top
#39751 - 07/01/10 05:52 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Anne]
Fnord Offline
senior member


Registered: 01/11/10
Posts: 2085
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Anne

Guess I set a poor examble of being satanist O.o


I'm a piss poor Satanist according to this test too. It's okay though, we can endeavor to buck all expectations of us set by this test and prove it wrong \:\)

That WOULD be Satanic!
_________________________
Dead and gone. Syonara.

Top
#39814 - 07/02/10 02:37 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Fnord]
Fnord Offline
senior member


Registered: 01/11/10
Posts: 2085
Loc: Texas
Found another test yesterday... I got the same result. This one graduated versus y/n and asks fewer (and more blunt) questions.

Anyone else?

http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/mmdi/questionnaire/
_________________________
Dead and gone. Syonara.

Top
#39849 - 07/03/10 10:59 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Fnord]
Clicks Offline
member


Registered: 06/14/10
Posts: 114
Loc: New Orleans
Your personality type is probably ISTP (or perhaps INTP). In case you are one of the 15% for whom this result is not correct, you should regard this as a starting point only and use this report to decide for yourself what your personality type is.

You can divide the world into two hemispheres: north and south. However, this does not mean that countries in the north are all alike (compare, say, Somalia and Iceland, from the North, or New Zealand and Argentina, from the south). In a similar way, personality type is more sophisticated than the choice between four pairs of opposites.

66% ISTJ
57% ISFJ
53% INFJ
62% INTJ
86% ISTP
69% ISFP
66% INFP
84% INTP
63% ESTP
54% ESFP
50% ENFP
59% ENTP
49% ESTJ
32% ESFJ
29% ENFJ
47% ENTJ


Seems legit, brah.
_________________________
Join your local Wizards' Association today!

Top
#41366 - 08/03/10 09:20 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
SODOMIZER Offline
pledge


Registered: 07/04/10
Posts: 61
I think it's important to remember that online tests are dumb scripts returning answers based on a very narrow metric. If you want an accurate personality type or an IQ test, go to a trained professional. Avoid anything online.

As a side observation, it seems to me that a LOT of people come back with INTJs -- more than in real life. They sort of view it as a badge of honor, and in many cases, a justification for their antisocial behavior or social troubles.

Before you judge that statement, visit here:

http://intjforum.com/

I think you'll see what I mean.
_________________________
SC / O9A

Top
#41368 - 08/03/10 12:12 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: SODOMIZER]
Lamar Offline
member


Registered: 02/03/10
Posts: 226
Loc: Alabama
 Originally Posted By: SODOMIZER
I think it's important to remember that online tests are dumb scripts returning answers based on a very narrow metric. If you want an accurate personality type or an IQ test, go to a trained professional. Avoid anything online.

As a side observation, it seems to me that a LOT of people come back with INTJs -- more than in real life. They sort of view it as a badge of honor, and in many cases, a justification for their antisocial behavior or social troubles.

Before you judge that statement, visit here:

http://intjforum.com/

I think you'll see what I mean.


I came back with INTP: 50 introverted, 38 intuitive, 12 thinking, 6 percieving. I'll admit, I am antisocial. I find my best moments are spent alone and with certain friends than in big social gatherings or the workplace.

Top
#41408 - 08/04/10 01:41 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
XiaoGui17 Offline
active member


Registered: 10/21/09
Posts: 1139
Loc: Amarillo, TX
So NT's (the "Competitive" type, as Persona Architecture calls them,) make up over two thirds of the 600 Club so far. Rational and fast-paced. Yeah, I was pretty much expecting that. The most common full type is the INTJ, which seems to make up over a third of the 600 club thus far.

I knew that Morgan would be a J, which is probably why I tend to drive her crazy. I'm an INTP. The description provided by Zophos is a quite accurate portrayal of how I work. P's are always picking at the nuance of things, the fine print, learning all the in's and out's of every last knitty gritty detail. J's, on the other hand, are satisfied with knowing the general answer for practical purposes. Once a J has made up her mind, she's ready to move on to the next thing. P's tend to linger. My nit-picking need for precision of meaning tends to irritate the ever-living kaka out of J's.

P moment:
When I was 3, I asked my mother if I could have an apple. She said no, I could not; it was just 15 minutes to dinner and I'd ruin my appetite. She came back in to see me eating a banana. When she asked why I had defied her, I pointed out that technically she had forbidden me to have an apple; she had said nothing about a banana. As an N, I was able to make the connection and knew that I was defying her intentions, but as a P, I found a loophole anyway.

I'm also not surprised that Jake999 is an SJ, or "Methodical" type. These people dot all their i's and cross all their t's; they're the kind you want managing paperwork and the like. He's the perfect type for the kind of work he did at the Black House.

I'm surprised that people view "INTJ" as a badge of honor, as SODOMIZER describes it. The most successful and well educated type is the ENTJ (Morgan's type). Their charisma (E), comprehension of the bigger picture (N), rational approach (T), and decisive behavior (J) lend themselves to getting lots of shit done, fast and well. I somewhat envy them; I often find myself drifting off into pontification instead of finishing stuff. I tend to over-analyze whatever I'm working on, and it slows me down.
_________________________
Wir halten uns an Regeln, Wenn man uns regeln lässt

Top
#41410 - 08/04/10 01:50 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: SODOMIZER]
Clicks Offline
member


Registered: 06/14/10
Posts: 114
Loc: New Orleans
I realise how inacurate these tests are. I don't take them for anything more than amusement. One reason I posted was to see how many people would classify themselves as INTJ. Just about everyone on here seems to have very high opinions of themselves due to their ideolgy, and not any actual merit. I'm not saying everybody! Don't be jumping all over me. I just mean most people.
_________________________
Join your local Wizards' Association today!

Top
#41473 - 08/05/10 01:47 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Clicks]
TheInsane Offline
member


Registered: 09/16/09
Posts: 356
Your Type is INTJ.

Introverted - 44
Intuitive - 50
Thinking - 100
Judging - 44

Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:

* moderately expressed introvert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* very expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed judging personality


This fits very well with how I am and what I do.

Top
#42464 - 08/25/10 05:40 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: TheInsane]
Wolflust Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/20/09
Posts: 33
You are:

* moderately expressed introvert
* slightly expressed intuitive personality
* slightly expressed feeling personality
* slightly expressed judging personality

Mhmmmmmmmmmm...I really am not sure. I feel slightly moderate! \:D

INFJ

Introverted 33 % - Intuitive 12 % - Feeling 12 % - Judging 22%

Career indicator was spot on to where Im at/heading right now, I must say.

Other people of your particular type: Mother Teresa.
OH MY! Haha \:D

Maybe its time to get ones hands dirty for real instead!

_________________________
It is not my name or my number, its how I use it and what I do.

Top
#42467 - 08/25/10 07:50 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Wolflust]
Autodidact Offline
member


Registered: 01/23/10
Posts: 428
Looks like Morgan and I are the only Fieldmarshals, but a *lot* of those questions could go either way.

Your Type is
ENTJ
Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
22 25 25 44


You are:

* slightly expressed extravert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed judging personality
_________________________
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur?

Top
#42546 - 08/27/10 12:26 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Damis]
Ringmaster Offline
member


Registered: 04/07/08
Posts: 205
Loc: Salem Oregon
ISTJ
very expressed introvert
slightly expressed sensing personality
very expressed thinking personality
very expressed judging personality

Well I guess it's somewhat accurate. Did prove pretty interesting though.
_________________________
Get off the cross and save yourself, I feel no pity for the cries of a weak man.

Top
#43046 - 09/16/10 02:54 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: SODOMIZER]
Milchar Offline
stranger


Registered: 08/26/10
Posts: 35
Loc: Göteborg, Sweden
 Originally Posted By: SODOMIZER
I think it's important to remember that online tests are dumb scripts returning answers based on a very narrow metric. If you want an accurate personality type or an IQ test, go to a trained professional. Avoid anything online.


It's a problem of all psychological tests, not only the online ones. Human personality is too complicated to be precisely described with answers on just a few questions. Also people answer what they think about themselves, but it's sometimes far from the reality.

Top
#43074 - 09/16/10 10:19 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Damis]
Nicholas DePrey Offline
stranger


Registered: 07/24/10
Posts: 17
Loc: Sweden
ISTJ

Introverted 67%
Sensing 50%
Thinking 12%
Judging 11%

So, I have same peronality as Clint Eastwood \:\)
_________________________
I am who I am

Top
#43080 - 09/17/10 08:13 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Nicholas DePrey]
TV is God Moderator Offline
Moderator
member


Registered: 08/11/08
Posts: 273
Loc: The Cornhole
INTP. Pretty accurate I'd say.
I understand that a lot of the questions could go either way but without the test I'd look at the options and come to this conclusion as objective self observation and self improvement has been my main focus in my adult years.


"INTPs are pensive, analytical folks. They may venture so deeply into thought as to seem detached, and often actually are oblivious to the world around them."


Yeah I'm pretty much buried in my own head. It's not uncommon for me to just not notice someone is talking directly to me because I'm lost in thought. When I'm studying a problem or working on a project hours burn away like nothing.

I often feel like consciousness is more of a dream I'm just observing rather than experiencing; probably why my family is so susceptible to schizophrenia.

"Precise about their descriptions, INTPs will often correct others (or be sorely tempted to) if the shade of meaning is a bit off."
Absolutely true about me. As a young child I had no sense of filter for it and I acted like I was the policeman of all truth. (That didn't win me too many friends lol) In my teen years caused me to develop the "I'm dictator of all truth! My opinion is LAW!" I've been growing out of that these past couple years thankfully.


Introverted
No possible question of that.

Intuitive
The good and the bad of it. I have a very difficult time grasping some things people seem to find obvious and a very easy time understanding things people seem to find perplexing. Best example would be my poor social skills. From experience I've learned enough to get by (maybe still coming off like a creep at times) but on a large scale I don't to really get it. Since it doesn't really hold my interest I don't know that I ever will. I'll only learn it as far as absolutely necessary.

Thinking
Thinking vs. feeling, thinking's a given. Although I don't know that there's anyone who can say they'll never have moments of weakness where emotions overtake sensibility. Regrettably when very frustrated that T can turn into an F in the worst way.

Perceiving
Again the best and the worst of it. I think a J has an easier time getting through life because unlike P's they get shit done. On what I really love I usually go through a long periods of P and short productive bursts of J. I'll sometimes spend months thinking about what to do for the feeling and theme of a project and then actually hammer it out usually only taking a day or two to actually write and record a song and in that period I'm very confident in quick decision making.
While I think this mindset has done me well it really only goes for the things I love doing which don't seem to intersect much with the things it's important for me to do.

I think understanding how your own mind works as objectively as possible is about the most important thing you can do and I would state with confidence that it's the core virtue of Satanism.

Top
#43155 - 09/22/10 05:55 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Damis]
Daafje666 Offline
pledge


Registered: 01/08/09
Posts: 73
Loc: The Netherlands
Extraverted: 44%
Intuitive: 38%
Thinking: 38%
Judging: 11%


moderately expressed extravert

moderately expressed intuitive personality

moderately expressed thinking personality

slightly expressed judging personality


Seems pretty stable to me:P
_________________________
That's why.

Top
#43166 - 09/23/10 11:55 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Daafje666]
XBlackXScorpionX Offline
stranger


Registered: 08/05/10
Posts: 24
Loc: Arizona
Extraverted 11%
Sensing 12%
Thinking 75%
Judging 22%

slightly expressed extravert
slightly expressed sensing personality
distinctively expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality

Flattering but wrong.

Top
#94393 - 11/24/14 05:41 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Nicholas DePrey]
G.Belbo Offline
stranger


Registered: 06/04/14
Posts: 18
Loc: Greece
INTJ

Introvert(22%)
iNtuitive(62%)
Thinking(25%)
Judging(33%)

You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (22%)
You have distinct preference of Intuition over Sensing (62%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (25%)
You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (33%)
_________________________
All my heroes have failed.

Top
#94412 - 11/24/14 03:01 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: G.Belbo]
Czereda Offline
senior member


Registered: 03/14/11
Posts: 1817
Loc: Poland
INFJ Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging

INFJs are champions of the oppressed and downtrodden. They often are found in the wake of an emergency, rescuing those who are in acute distress. INFJs may fantasize about getting revenge on those who victimize the defenseless. The concept of 'poetic justice' is appealing to the INFJ.

Lol this one gave me a chuckle. I mean... someone finally figured me out.


Edited by Czereda (11/24/14 03:02 PM)
_________________________
Anna Czereda
O9A Meme Cat

Top
#94444 - 11/26/14 03:25 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: G.Belbo]
Megatron Offline
active member


Registered: 08/22/14
Posts: 859
Loc: fuckit, some kid cracked my co...
 Originally Posted By: G.Belbo
INTJ

Introvert(22%)
iNtuitive(62%)
Thinking(25%)
Judging(33%)

You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (22%)
You have distinct preference of Intuition over Sensing (62%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (25%)
You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (33%)


Got roughly the same: Introvert(67%) iNtuitive(50%) Thinking(62%) Judging(1%)

You have distinct preference of Introversion over Extraversion (67%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (50%)
You have distinct preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%)
You have marginal or no preference of Judging over Perceiving (1%)

Notice I said roughly, lol.


Edited by Megatron (11/26/14 03:26 PM)
Edit Reason: This message will self destruct in . . .
_________________________
You can't beat me, I'm a fucking Transformer (TM), dude.

Oh, and I spell everything right.

Top
#94447 - 11/26/14 03:39 PM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Megatron]
mountaingoat Offline
member


Registered: 05/08/10
Posts: 471
Loc: Colorado
INTP
Introvert(44%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(50%) Perceiving(56%)
You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (50%)
You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (56%)
_________________________
“The human race is unimportant. It is the self that must not be betrayed."

-John Fowles

Top
#94469 - 11/28/14 04:31 AM Re: Jung personality test [Re: Megatron]
G.Belbo Offline
stranger


Registered: 06/04/14
Posts: 18
Loc: Greece
 Originally Posted By: Megatron
Got roughly the same: Introvert(67%) iNtuitive(50%) Thinking(62%) Judging(1%)

You have distinct preference of Introversion over Extraversion (67%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (50%)
You have distinct preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%)
You have marginal or no preference of Judging over Perceiving (1%)

Notice I said roughly, lol.


Yeah, roughly!

To be honest I'm kinda curious as to why that very small preference of Judging over Perceiving.. I was expecting more Judging by you.

(I know, sorry for the one liner)

ps: I'm waiting for the guy with the Feeling over Thinking stats.
_________________________
All my heroes have failed.

Top
Page all of 3 123>


Moderator:  Woland, TV is God, fakepropht, SkaffenAmtiskaw, Asmedious, Fist 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.046 seconds of which 0.002 seconds were spent on 51 queries. Zlib compression disabled.