#39522 - 06/23/10 01:02 PM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: Meq]
|
Fnord
active member
Registered: 01/11/10
Posts: 718
Loc: Texas
|
Any Extroverts or Feeling types here?
Guilty on one count. INFP
89% very expressed introvert
50% moderately expressed intuitive personality
12% slightly expressed feeling personality
44% moderately expressed perceiving personality
From what I've read, about 90% of the personality type is accurate to me.
_________________________
Scratching Peace Symbols on Your Tombstone
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#39524 - 06/23/10 01:58 PM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: Fnord]
|
6Satan6Archist6
senior member
Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2233
Loc: Oregon
|
INTJ
33% Introverted
25% Intuitive
38% Thinking
1% Judging
moderately expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality
"When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know."
Check
"personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.
This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness."
Seems about right.
_________________________
Ultimate Satanic Bad Ass of Ultimate Satanic Bad Assery PhD Esq. LLC Inc.^∞ DCLXVI°
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#39528 - 06/23/10 03:10 PM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: Diavolo]
|
Nemesis
senior member
Registered: 09/01/07
Posts: 2029
Loc: US
|
Yes or No sure doesn't feel like a good option on some questions.
D.
I thought the same thing. At lease a dozen questions I could have answered either way, depending upon the situation at hand. Ah well!
Re: Jake
ESTJ
Early Stage Thermonuclear Justice
Haha! Too right!
_________________________
Nothing is sacred.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#39529 - 06/23/10 03:34 PM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: Nemesis]
|
Zophos
member
Registered: 03/28/10
Posts: 115
Loc: U.S.A.
|
INTP — The Architect
Introverted: 100%
Intuitive: 89%
Thinking: 95%
Perceiving: 79%
"INTPs exhibit the greatest precision in thought and language of all the types; they tend to see distinctions and inconsistencies in thought and language instantaneously. The one word which captures the unique style of INTPs is architect—the architect of ideas and systems as well as the architect of edifices. This type is found in only 1 percent of the population and therefore is not encountered as frequently as some of the other types. INTPs detect contradictions in statements no matter how distant in space or time the contradictory statements were produced. The intellectual scanning of INTPs has a principled quality; that is, INTPs search for whatever is relevant and pertinent to the issue at hand. Consequently, INTPs can concentrate better than any other type.
Authority derived from office, position, or wide acceptance does not impress INTPs. Only statements that are logical and coherent carry weight. External authority per se is irrelevant. INTPs abhor redundancy and incoherence. Possessing a desire to understand the universe, an INTP is constantly looking for natural law. Curiosity concerning these keys to the universe is a driving force in this type. INTPs prize intelligence in themselves and in others, but can become intellectual dilletantes as a result of their need to amass ideas, principles, or understanding of behavior. And once they know something, it is remembered. INTPs can become obsessed with analysis. Once caught up in a thought process, that thought process seems to have a will of its own for INTPs, and they persevere until the issue is comprehended in all its complexity. They can be intellectual snobs and may show impatience at times with others less endowed intellectually. This quality, INTPs find, generates hostility and defensive behaviors on the part of others, who may describe an INTP as arrogant.
For INTPs, the world exists primarily to be understood. Reality is trivial, a mere arena for proving ideas. It is essential that the universe is understood and that whatever is stated about the universe is stated correctly, with coherence and without redundancy. This is the INTP's final purpose. It matters not whether others understand or accept his or her truths. The INTP is the logician, the mathematician, the philosopher, the scientist; any pursuit requiring architecture of ideas intrigues this type. INTPs should not, however, be asked to work out the implementation or application of their models to the real world. The INTP is the architect of a system and leaves it to others to be the builder and the applicator. Very often, therefore, the INTP's work is not credited to him or her. The builder and the applier gains fame and fortune, while the INTP's name remains obscure. Appreciation of an INTP's theoretical work frequently comes posthumously—or the work may never be removed from library shelves at all and thus lost.
INTPs deal with the environment primarily through intuition, and their strongest quality, the thinking function, remains relatively hidden except in close associations. Therefore, INTPs are often misunderstood, seen as difficult to know, and seldom perceived at their true level of competency. They are inclined to be shy except when with close friends, and their reserve is difficult to penetrate. They are very adaptable until one of their principles is violated. Then INTPs are not adaptable at all! They may have difficulty in being understood by others because they tend to think in a complicated fashion and want to be precise, never redundant in their communications. Because their feeling qualities may be underdeveloped, they may be insensitive to the wants and wishes of others, often quite unaware of the existence of these wants and wishes." (excerpted from Source)
Z.
_________________________
Nihil sit tam infirmum aut instabile quam fama potentiae non sua vi nita.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#39531 - 06/23/10 06:37 PM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: Diavolo]
|
Clicks
member
Registered: 06/14/10
Posts: 114
Loc: New Orleans
|
It seems we've got a decently varied crowd here, based on what this test can show (which isn't much).
INTJ
Yes or No sure doesn't feel like a good option on some questions.
D.
Agreed. As I was taking the test and pondering the answers I would think "Sometimes, but given the details of a situation maybe..."
I like taking these tests every once in a while to see how accurate they can get, but I never expect too much out of them, especially from ones that only offer yes or no answers. There's too much to analyze to be able to give a truly accurate test. Still fun though. When you get a personallity description that seems to fit you decently you get that little moment of, "Oh teehee! That's me!"
_________________________
Join your local Wizards' Association today!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#39540 - 06/23/10 10:41 PM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: zippadydooda]
|
Morgan
senior member
Registered: 08/29/07
Posts: 2304
Loc: New York City
|
Rational Field Marshal Personality
Extraverted: 1%
Intuitive: 62%
Thinking: 50%
Judging: 44%
Not completely sold on those numbers but the other stuff seems interesting, and some on point:
Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition it is marshaling or situational organizing role that reaches the highest development in the Fieldmarshal. As this kind of role is practiced some contingency organizing is necessary, so that the second suit of the Fieldmarshal's intellect is devising contingency plans. Structural and functional engineering, though practiced in some degree in the course of organizational operations, tend to be not nearly as well developed and are soon outstripped by the rapidly growing skills in organizing. But it must be said that any kind of strategic exercise tends to bring added strength to engineering as well as organizing skills.
Hardly more than two percent of the total population, Fieldmarshals are bound to lead others, and from an early age they can be observed taking command of groups. In some cases, they simply find themselves in charge of groups, and are mystified as to how this happened. But the reason is that they have a strong natural urge to give structure and direction wherever they are - to harness people in the field and to direct them to achieve distant goals. They resemble Supervisors in their tendency to establish plans for a task, enterprise, or organization, but Fieldmarshals search more for policy and goals than for regulations and procedures.
They cannot not build organizations, and cannot not push to implement their goals. When in charge of an organization, whether in the military, business, education, or government, Fieldmarshals more than any other type desire (and generally have the ability) to visualize where the organization is going, and they seem able to communicate that vision to others. Their organizational and coordinating skills tends to be highly developed, which means that they are likely to be good at systematizing, ordering priorities, generalizing, summarizing, at marshaling evidence, and at demonstrating their ideas. Their ability to organize, however, may be more highly developed than their ability to analyze, and the Fieldmarshal leader may need to turn to an Inventor or Architect to provide this kind of input.
Fieldmarshals will usually rise to positions of responsibility and enjoy being executives. They are tireless in their devotion to their jobs and can easily block out other areas of life for the sake of their work. Superb administrators in any field - medicine, law, business, education, government, the military - Fieldmarshals organize their units into smooth-functioning systems, planning in advance, keeping both short-term and long-range objectives well in mind. For the Fieldmarshal, there must always be a goal-directed reason for doing anything, and people's feelings usually are not sufficient reason. They prefer decisions to be based on impersonal data, want to work from well thought-out plans, like to use engineered operations - and they expect others to follow suit. They are ever intent on reducing bureaucratic red tape, task redundancy, and aimless confusion in the workplace, and they are willing to dismiss employees who cannot get with the program and increase their efficiency.
Although Fieldmarshals are tolerant of established procedures, they can and will abandon any procedure when it can be shown to be ineffective in accomplishing its goal. Fieldmarshals root out and reject ineffectiveness and inefficiency, and are impatient with repetition of error.
Morgan
_________________________
Courage Conquering Fear
Fuck em if they can't take a joke
Don't Like What I Say, Kiss My Ass.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#41366 - 08/03/10 09:20 AM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: Clicks]
|
SODOMIZER
pledge
Registered: 07/04/10
Posts: 61
|
I think it's important to remember that online tests are dumb scripts returning answers based on a very narrow metric. If you want an accurate personality type or an IQ test, go to a trained professional. Avoid anything online.
As a side observation, it seems to me that a LOT of people come back with INTJs -- more than in real life. They sort of view it as a badge of honor, and in many cases, a justification for their antisocial behavior or social troubles.
Before you judge that statement, visit here:
http://intjforum.com/
I think you'll see what I mean.
_________________________
SC / O9A
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#41368 - 08/03/10 12:12 PM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: SODOMIZER]
|
Lamar
member
Registered: 02/03/10
Posts: 226
Loc: Alabama
|
I think it's important to remember that online tests are dumb scripts returning answers based on a very narrow metric. If you want an accurate personality type or an IQ test, go to a trained professional. Avoid anything online. As a side observation, it seems to me that a LOT of people come back with INTJs -- more than in real life. They sort of view it as a badge of honor, and in many cases, a justification for their antisocial behavior or social troubles. Before you judge that statement, visit here: http://intjforum.com/I think you'll see what I mean.
I came back with INTP: 50 introverted, 38 intuitive, 12 thinking, 6 percieving. I'll admit, I am antisocial. I find my best moments are spent alone and with certain friends than in big social gatherings or the workplace.
_________________________
Blast for Satan
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41408 - 08/04/10 01:41 AM
Re: Jung personality test
[Re: Clicks]
|
XiaoGui17
member
Registered: 10/21/09
Posts: 310
Loc: Austin, TX
|
So NT's (the "Competitive" type, as Persona Architecture calls them,) make up over two thirds of the 600 Club so far. Rational and fast-paced. Yeah, I was pretty much expecting that. The most common full type is the INTJ, which seems to make up over a third of the 600 club thus far.
I knew that Morgan would be a J, which is probably why I tend to drive her crazy. I'm an INTP. The description provided by Zophos is a quite accurate portrayal of how I work. P's are always picking at the nuance of things, the fine print, learning all the in's and out's of every last knitty gritty detail. J's, on the other hand, are satisfied with knowing the general answer for practical purposes. Once a J has made up her mind, she's ready to move on to the next thing. P's tend to linger. My nit-picking need for precision of meaning tends to irritate the ever-living kaka out of J's.
P moment:
When I was 3, I asked my mother if I could have an apple. She said no, I could not; it was just 15 minutes to dinner and I'd ruin my appetite. She came back in to see me eating a banana. When she asked why I had defied her, I pointed out that technically she had forbidden me to have an apple; she had said nothing about a banana. As an N, I was able to make the connection and knew that I was defying her intentions, but as a P, I found a loophole anyway.
I'm also not surprised that Jake999 is an SJ, or "Methodical" type. These people dot all their i's and cross all their t's; they're the kind you want managing paperwork and the like. He's the perfect type for the kind of work he did at the Black House.
I'm surprised that people view "INTJ" as a badge of honor, as SODOMIZER describes it. The most successful and well educated type is the ENTJ (Morgan's type). Their charisma (E), comprehension of the bigger picture (N), rational approach (T), and decisive behavior (J) lend themselves to getting lots of shit done, fast and well. I somewhat envy them; I often find myself drifting off into pontification instead of finishing stuff. I tend to over-analyze whatever I'm working on, and it slows me down.
_________________________
'Tis only daylight that makes us sin.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Woland, Mercury_Templar, fakepropht, Nemesis, SkaffenAmtiskaw, Morgan, Bacchae, Diavolo, Asmedious, Fist
|
|
