Page all of 3 123>
Topic Options
#40685 - 07/23/10 08:01 AM David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture
merickal80 Offline
lurker


Registered: 07/19/10
Posts: 2
David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture



An embarrassing new picture of David Myatt has emerged, exposing David Myatt as a 'Satanist' whose written work is rendered worthless because of its lack of provenance.

http://voiceoverthere.wordpress.com

The question is, if you are proud of being a Satanist, why lie about it?

Two new academic research projects and a close textual analysis of David Myatt's 'writings', show David Myatt's long term relationships with established neo-nazi Satanists.

The blog:

http://voiceoverthere.wordpress.com

casts doubt on the veracity of everything that David Myatt has ever written. Myatt disowned every document written under his own name, when he was interviewed by the police. There is no certain method of establishing genuine documents written by Myatt and worthless trash written by imposters. Therefore all work attributed to David Myatt should be consigned to the trashcan.

A Satanist who denies responsibility for his work - Satanic or neo-nazi - as soon as the police are involved, does not have a body of work which can be positively attributed to him.

These new studies provide a much needed independent analysis, to explode the mythology surrounding David Myatt.

Top
#40686 - 07/23/10 08:10 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
Morgan Offline
Princess of Hell
stalker


Registered: 08/29/07
Posts: 2956
Loc: New York City
"Therefore all work attributed to David Myatt should be consigned to the trashcan."

So I gather you are in favor of throwing out the baby with the dirty bathwater too?

Who care what he looks like. To the best of my knowledge no one on this site is fucking him, married to him, or eating breakfast with him.

It's not a matter of being proud of being a Satanist, its a matter of personal survival skills. Why the fuck would anyone want a free trip to a prison cell? If you can lie, or deny and avoid an unnecessary trip to copville, I would suggest you think about it.

Bashing the man, or the body of work he has created is kinda stupid and petty. You don't have to like him or agree with him, but his views/writings have influenced people and left a mark on the left hand path to say the least.

Morgan
_________________________
Courage Conquering Fear
Fuck em if they can't take a joke
Don't Like What I Say, Kiss My Ass



Top
#40692 - 07/23/10 11:26 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
Some people will never get it I guess. This post didn't even make me sigh.

As far as I know none of the ONA breed really cares about this; it's always the outsiders that get hyped up by something they just can't understand or who put the emphasis on things others consider trivial.

And, as a side-note; if you lived a more thrilling life, you'd surely would have experienced and realized yourself that the cops are not your friends. The idea you should tell the truth to them might work fine in the movies but in reality, you shut up or lie.

D.

Top
#40693 - 07/23/10 11:27 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
Caladrius Offline
member


Registered: 07/25/09
Posts: 320
Loc: SoCal
 Originally Posted By: merickal80
David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture



An embarrassing new picture of David Myatt has emerged, exposing David Myatt as a 'Satanist' whose written work is rendered worthless because of its lack of provenance.

http://voiceoverthere.wordpress.com

The question is, if you are proud of being a Satanist, why lie about it?

Two new academic research projects and a close textual analysis of David Myatt's 'writings', show David Myatt's long term relationships with established neo-nazi Satanists.

The blog:

http://voiceoverthere.wordpress.com

casts doubt on the veracity of everything that David Myatt has ever written. Myatt disowned every document written under his own name, when he was interviewed by the police. There is no certain method of establishing genuine documents written by Myatt and worthless trash written by imposters. Therefore all work attributed to David Myatt should be consigned to the trashcan.

A Satanist who denies responsibility for his work - Satanic or neo-nazi - as soon as the police are involved, does not have a body of work which can be positively attributed to him.

These new studies provide a much needed independent analysis, to explode the mythology surrounding David Myatt.


Don't mind this nutcase, he's been doing this for 4 years straight in other forums. It's usually the same handful of things he has to say. I'm surprised he didn't do the "Myatt ran over a cripple woman" spiel... he will if given time.

 Quote:
An embarrassing new picture of David Myatt has emerged,


Who cares? Who actually gives a shit over the past 4 years? I got all excited last time I saw this idiot post this "embarrassing new picture" shit elsewhere. Thought I was gunna see naked pictures or something.

 Quote:
exposing David Myatt as a 'Satanist' whose written work is rendered worthless because of its lack of provenance.


Who cares? I don't think it's DM's pile of written work that turns people mindlessly to him you MOAC. Personally I have my own thoughts and worldviews, which resonates with DM's. That's about as simple as it gets.

Who in affiliated or associated with Myatt in any way comes to him with a blank mind to be filled with Myatt stuff? I don't know of any. Cite me a few people.

 Quote:

The question is, if you are proud of being a Satanist, why lie about it?


Who cares? Who says he was a "Satanist" to begin with? "Satanism" is an "outer form" used as a means to try and get something doen: Sinister Dialectic, I believe it's called.

 Quote:

Two new academic research projects and a close textual analysis of David Myatt's 'writings', show David Myatt's long term relationships with established neo-nazi Satanists.


Who cares? And those academic nerds knows David Myatt personally? Do they have a degree in following the man and studying his every move and checks up on who he associates with? Most of his associates now aren't even White, such as myself.

I'm half Asian half Mexican. I've been in a long term relationship with a "neo-nazi Satanist" ONA member. Again: Sinister Dialectic. If you wanna manipulate people to do things for you, as a subversive "operative" you just have to know how to shapeshift.

 Quote:
casts doubt on the veracity of everything that David Myatt has ever written. Myatt disowned every document written under his own name, when he was interviewed by the police.


Who cares? And who wrote this? You see what you're doing? What you're doing is you pranse around the internet assuming that people who "follow" David Myatt come to hime with an empty mind and gets their empty minds blindly filled with Myatt memes.

You have a very primitive understanding of howan intelligent person's mind works. Here you are presenting a paragraph of shit. Do you expect readers here to empty-headedly accept what you have written?

Who wrote this shit? What are they affiliated with? Their credentials? Their motives? Your motives?

 Quote:
There is no certain method of establishing genuine documents written by Myatt and worthless trash written by imposters. Therefore all work attributed to David Myatt should be consigned to the trashcan.


Who cares? Who cares what he wrote or didn't write? It doesn't matter any more. At least not in the ONA. He is not the only source of written material and ideas. He is only one of many now. It not really about who wrote what even. It's the quality of insight the MSS has and if such insights are of any use.

 Quote:


A Satanist who denies responsibility for his work - Satanic or neo-nazi - as soon as the police are involved, does not have a body of work which can be positively attributed to him.

These new studies provide a much needed independent analysis, to explode the mythology surrounding David Myatt.


Who cares? I mean really? During the 4 years that you have been doing this in other forums, what End Result has it accomplished for you? Beside people calling you a nutcase, you fool.

"New studies" ... "analysis"... by what or who? And "authority" on Myatt? You telling me some university charges tuition to have people study a 4 year course on David Myatt's life so they can have a PhD on Myatt's life and shit? What the hell is wrong with you?


Edited by Caladrius (07/23/10 11:29 AM)
_________________________
Chloe 352

Top
#40694 - 07/23/10 01:10 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
6Satan6Archist6 Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2509
At the risk of sounding like a broken record: Who cares?

While I personally have no connection to ONA, other than sporadically reading some of their texts, I do know there are people on this site who have made use of ONA material. If you don't like what they have to say then don't subject yourself to it. It's as easy as that.

It is no secret that I harbor nothing but contempt for the Neo-Nazi movement but as long as they aren't congregating in my backyard I couldn't care less. And besides, as I have come to understand(?) National Socialism was merely a tool to be used to achieve one's own ends. I'm surprised you didn't bring up Myatt's purported conversion to Islam (also a tool) and try to use that against him as well. Unless I am confusing him with someone else.

I wonder what your motivation behind this post is anyway. I mean, do you have any real reason for engaging in this smear campaign or are you just bored? Don't answer that, it was rhetorical and I don't really care anyway.

Edit: I don't see what is so embarrassing about that picture. Not everyone can be as sexy as I am.


Edited by 6Satan6Archist6 (07/23/10 01:10 PM)
Edit Reason: Marked.
_________________________
No gods. No masters.

Top
#40696 - 07/23/10 02:17 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: 6Satan6Archist6]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
I expected a photo of him in a pink tutu performing the dying swan on stage. I mean, didn't they write "embarrassing"? And even then, I might frown but would it really matter?

Anyone familiar with Myatt knows how he looks like. It's not as if anyone of us expects him to dress in black and use corpse paint. While his work is respected, his persona isn't put on a pedestal.

The baby skull with the nail inside is supposed to trigger some emotion in us I guess.

D.

Top
#40697 - 07/23/10 02:43 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Morgan]
Michael A.Aquino Offline
stalker


Registered: 09/28/08
Posts: 2573
Loc: San Francisco, CA, USA
 Originally Posted By: Morgan
"Therefore all work attributed to David Myatt should be consigned to the trashcan."

So I gather you are in favor of throwing out the baby with the dirty bathwater too?

Who care what he looks like. To the best of my knowledge no one on this site is fucking him, married to him, or eating breakfast with him.

It's not a matter of being proud of being a Satanist, its a matter of personal survival skills. Why the fuck would anyone want a free trip to a prison cell? If you can lie, or deny and avoid an unnecessary trip to copville, I would suggest you think about it.

Bashing the man, or the body of work he has created is kinda stupid and petty. You don't have to like him or agree with him, but his views/writings have influenced people and left a mark on the left hand path to say the least.

I was under the impression that David Myat/Anton Long/Stephen Brown/et al. had become a Muslim several years ago.

I agree that what he looks like is irrelevant to his views, but if those views are convenience/situation/publicity-chameleon, I see no reason to respect them or him. Aleister Crowley put it this way:

 Originally Posted By: A.C., The Confessions
If one had to worry about one’s actions in respect of other people’s ideas, one might as well be buried alive in an antheap or married to an ambitious violinist. Whether that man is the prime minister, modifying his opinions to catch votes, or a bourgeois in terror lest some harmless act should be misunderstood and outrage some petty convention, that man is an inferior man and I do not want to have anything to do with him any more than I want to eat canned salmon.

Of course the world forces us all to compromise with our environment to some extent, and we only waste our strength if we fight pitched battles for points which are not worth a skirmish. It is only a faddist who refuses to conform with conventions of dress and the like. But our sincerity should be Roman about things that really matter to us.

And I am still in doubt, as I write these words, as to how far it is right to employ strategy and diplomacy in order to gain one’s point. The great men of the world have stood up and taken their medicine ...

Adaptation to one’s environment makes for a sort of survival; but after all, the supreme victory is only won by those who prove themselves of so much harder stuff than the rest that no power on Earth is able to destroy them. The people who have really made history are the martyrs.
_________________________
Michael A. Aquino

Top
#40730 - 07/23/10 10:34 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Michael A.Aquino]
Morgan Offline
Princess of Hell
stalker


Registered: 08/29/07
Posts: 2956
Loc: New York City
"And I am still in doubt, as I write these words, as to how far it is right to employ strategy and diplomacy in order to gain one’s point."

You have to learn to choose your battles, and in doing so, learn what your enemies are planning next. Not every battle or discussion is just so cut and dry. As I am sure you know fuckers like to hide in tunnels and wait for you to fuck up. You can walk slowly by, or keep the flamethrower on. What you choose to do depends if it is day or night.

"The people who have really made history are the martyrs."

The martyrs end up dead. With being dead the game is over. The winners write and record history.

In all honesty, if the cops are at your door, they are there for a reason. Somehow I seriously doubt that they would just ring his bell and ask "Hey, are you Myatt? Did you write this dribble?" Then if he responses "No", they walk away.

This whole stupid bash fest is a joke.

M
_________________________
Courage Conquering Fear
Fuck em if they can't take a joke
Don't Like What I Say, Kiss My Ass



Top
#40733 - 07/23/10 11:54 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
ta2zz Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/28/07
Posts: 1552
Loc: Connecticut

 Originally Posted By: merickal80
An embarrassing new picture of David Myatt has emerged

Wow you really think someones appearance matters I bet their screen name is really important as well?

I myself find in life that there are those who talk and those who do. For the most part those doing so much talking are not spending enough time doing.

Silly me for looking at the blog. After a few lines I realized I really don't care enough to even read it.

~T~
_________________________
We are the music makers, And we are the dreamers of dreams. ~Arthur William Edgar O'Shaughnessy

Top
#40734 - 07/24/10 02:12 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Morgan]
Michael A.Aquino Offline
stalker


Registered: 09/28/08
Posts: 2573
Loc: San Francisco, CA, USA
 Originally Posted By: Wicked Wanda
You have to learn to choose your battles, and in doing so, learn what your enemies are planning next. Not every battle or discussion is just so cut and dry. As I am sure you know fuckers like to hide in tunnels and wait for you to fuck up. You can walk slowly by, or keep the flamethrower on. What you choose to do depends if it is day or night.

Indeed, and I believe AC drew that distinction. But his main point had to do with the sincerity of one's convictions and the strength of one's character to stand by and stand up for them. That is a test I have regularly faced since I joined the Church of Satan in 1969, and not once have I failed or evaded it, even when it might have been "advantageous" to do so. [And that included when the cops showed up at my door, in the "SRA" scam attempted against Lilith and myself.]

 Originally Posted By: Wanda
 Originally Posted By: A.C.
"The people who have really made history are the martyrs."

The martyrs end up dead. With being dead the game is over. The winners write and record history.

Well, there are the martyrs who just go limp and let themselves be burned at the stake. But I think AC meant this in the more profound sense that some proponents of ideas have been so dedicated to them that they would risk inconvenience, injury, or death for them; as for instance: "And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor."

 Originally Posted By: Wanda
In all honesty, if the cops are at your door, they are there for a reason. Somehow I seriously doubt that they would just ring his bell and ask "Hey, are you Myatt? Did you write this dribble?" Then if he responses "No", they walk away.

Sometimes the cops are there for a wrong reason, or even out of curiosity. Then it is your challenge and responsibility to straighten them out, which is possible in any bureaucratic situation.

If the cops are there for a right/factual reason, then of course it's an entirely different situation. If you broke a just law, you reap the consequences. If you think that the law is an unjust one, then your task is much harder; and the beneficiaries of your efforts may not be yourself, but those who come after you. [This brings up altruism, which is another interesting concept when considered by Satanists.]

 Originally Posted By: Wanda
This whole stupid bash fest is a joke.

I generally avoid criticizing the 600C, since I regard myself as a guest in your house, but I am surprised and disappointed at the shark-frenzy which often results from "unorthodox" speculations expressed here, particularly by new, inexperienced participants. I am not saying that you have to pander to stupidity, carelessness, or laziness. But sometimes a new person is just, well, a new person - trying out some elementary ideas, looking for guidance, and perhaps looking for friends in a very uncertain and allegedly-dangerous adventure. Instead of jumping to the attack [and I mean this generally, not with yourself or any other individual in mind], take a moment to remember how you were when you were taking your own first steps along the LHP. What would have strengthened you, helped you to do it better? Then try that.
_________________________
Michael A. Aquino

Top
#40736 - 07/24/10 02:49 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Michael A.Aquino]
Caladrius Offline
member


Registered: 07/25/09
Posts: 320
Loc: SoCal
 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino
I agree that he [Myatt] looks rather sexy in that embarrassing picture, but if those views are convenience/situation/publicity-chameleon, I see no reason to respect them or him. Aleister Crowley put it this way...


All I can say is Davie will commit suicide when I tell him Aquino has lost respeck for him. You're so insensitive sometimes Aquino... you know how much he adores you. And yes, we all - as well as DM - look up to Creepy Crowley and live by his every word.

 Quote:
...but if those views are convenience/situation/publicity-chameleon...


I thought I dropped enough clues in my first post about this? Those 4 possibilities are all you can think of to explain his actions? It's just impossible for you to figure out any other possible explanation?

There have been several times, or often actually, where David Myatt's radical Islamic writings have been on the front page of Al-Qaeda websites.

The question that the perceptive individual should ask themselves - assume they care - is: Who is his target Audience, you or Radical Islam? And Why?


Ibn Myatt's Islamic Writings
_________________________
Chloe 352

Top
#40741 - 07/24/10 03:31 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Michael A.Aquino]
The Zebu Offline
senior member


Registered: 08/08/08
Posts: 1646
Loc: Orlando, FL
David Myatt doesn't need any expose to discredit himself; unless becoming a terrorist-endorsing radical Muslim doesn't do it for you. Whether his heart has secretly been with the ONA all along is still a matter of questioning, but I really couldn't care less. The ONA stands on its own without him, and regardless of his current drama, Myatt and his collaborators have left their mark on Satanism, for good or ill.

My principle gripe is that the OP apparently came here with a flimsy agenda, what seems to be a hit-and-run post with the sole intent of not engaging in an exchange of ideas, but sticking some "expose" like we're some read-only bulletin board, and probably running off to some other LHP forum to copy-paste the same post.

I could be wrong; maybe he's an intelligent individual who has a lot to contribute to the forum-- but his first impression isn't too hot either. It's happened here too many times before.
_________________________
«Recibe, ¡oh Lucifer! la sangre de esta víctima que sacrifico en tu honor.»

Top
#40745 - 07/24/10 04:17 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: The Zebu]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
This is indeed hit and run and one can follow the trail of these posts all over the internet.

At times it is just hilarious. Anton Long trying to run down a disabled female cancer victim with his van. Seriously; a female, disabled AND having cancer? As if just running someone down with your van wouldn't be badass enough.

D.

Top
#40746 - 07/24/10 05:13 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Michael A.Aquino]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino
Indeed, and I believe AC drew that distinction. But his main point had to do with the sincerity of one's convictions and the strength of one's character to stand by and stand up for them. That is a test I have regularly faced since I joined the Church of Satan in 1969, and not once have I failed or evaded it, even when it might have been "advantageous" to do so. [And that included when the cops showed up at my door, in the "SRA" scam attempted against Lilith and myself.]


I think this is another distinct difference between types of Satanism. The sincerity of one's conviction and the strength of character to stand by and stand up for them do not imply trying to make a needless impression on the mass. One does not need to be approved, glorified or validated by these mundanes. Many people think they have to submit to the "rules" but those rules are their rules and none has to play along with them. We make up our own rules and live along those and if or if not, at some level, they have some resemblance with their rules is of little importance. The system we live in is simple; if you live life within their parameters, you are allowed to do so. If you do not, the system tries to neutralize you, or convert you to the right path again. As such, it is tolerated to be a Satanist as long as you are the right kind of Satanist. Some of us are not. Something which, again, explains the importance of being secretive.

My first serious encounter with the federal cops here was at 16. They did the good cop, bad cop routine on me but, at that age, I had seen those movies too. Yes I had been a bad boy and yes I knew what I did was considered criminal behaviour by the system but no I did not feel sorry, bad or guilty for doing so. I lived life according my principles and rules, admittedly more crude, undirected and juvenile as today but still.
My approach that time was omerta and as a result, by lack of evidence I walked. If I'd had been a martyr and confessed, I would have provided evidence at my own expense. They love confessions; if you hang the rope around your own neck, they don’t need to do the effort.

"I did it" are such sweet words but they should only be spoken when there is actual benefit to it. Seeing such behaviour as honourable only works if you regard their opinion or system as being important. I do not; I use or abuse it when it is appropriate to do so.

D.

Top
#40748 - 07/24/10 06:42 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: merickal80
An embarrassing new picture of David Myatt has emerged


Hey the silly Myatt stalker - the MOAC - finally made it here!

 Originally Posted By: merickal80

The question is, if you are proud of being a Satanist, why lie about it?


Because it's called being covert.

Because shape-shifting is a well known occult technique of the Left Hand Path, as used by the ONA.

That you even ask this question shows your total lack of knowledge of the ONA.

Fact is - Myatt's had a diverse and very interesting life over four decades. A life of practical deeds, on the edge, of risk, and danger. But also a life of thinking; a creative life.

What the ONA call "an exeatic life".

How many here can claim such diversity, such a-morality, such deeds?

In fact, his life could be said to be "the ONA in action", and the real clue is a-moral.

 Originally Posted By: merickal80

exposing David Myatt as a 'Satanist' whose written work is rendered worthless because of its lack of provenance.


The work of Anton Long is good enough to stand on its own merits. He and the ONA have greatly influenced both the LHP and Satanism.

Some people don't like his work; some do. In a 100 years time we'll see who is remembered and praised.

 Originally Posted By: merickal80
to explode the mythology surrounding David Myatt.


Well, I must say you help this mythology, what we call The Myatt Mythos, what with your hundreds of rants about Myatt spanning three years now, and your dozen or so anti-Myatt blogs.

You keep people talking about him. You get people to look him up. To read his writings.

You get people interested in the ONA. Good work! Keep it up.



Edited by Raffy (07/24/10 06:43 AM)
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#40749 - 07/24/10 06:58 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Michael A.Aquino]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino

I was under the impression that David Myattbecome a Muslim several years ago.


Seems Mr Myatt has now left Islam and developed his own philosophy called The Numinous Way aka the philosophy of the Numen.

Now, while you and others are free to assume that Myatt is Long, there's actually no direct evidence that he is. Only opinion, and speculation, and rumor.

Even Jacob C's academic thesis does not provide solid evidence, only assumption, speculation.

To quote such a person - as the Myatt stalker does - and then say that this "proves" Myatt is Long is to commit the logical fallacy of "the appeal to authority" (or at least I think it's that fallacy).

 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino
I agree that what he looks like is irrelevant to his views,


True, and for those interested there are dozens of images of Myatt, dressed in a variety of ways, all over the Net, from farm worker, to cyclist, to country gent. There's also a recent oil painting of him by artist Richard Moult dressed in a suit and tie, called the Green Damask Room

http://richardmoult.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/the-green-damask-room/

Google images of David Myatt for some.

 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino

but if those views are convenience/situation/publicity-chameleon, I see no reason to respect them or him.


But if they are a sinister person being covert, doing deeds covertly, doing amoral stuff, and using "sinister cloaking" aka shape-shifting, then surely that's another matter, isn't it?


Edited by Raffy (07/24/10 06:59 AM)
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#40750 - 07/24/10 07:20 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
For a completely different picture of David Myatt, check out Myatt's own blog at

http://davidmyatt.wordpress.com/

and also his recent autobiography, in which he denies being Mr Anton Long -

http://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/david-myatt-myngath5.pdf
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#40751 - 07/24/10 01:21 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Diavolo]
Michael A.Aquino Offline
stalker


Registered: 09/28/08
Posts: 2573
Loc: San Francisco, CA, USA
 Originally Posted By: Diavolo
The sincerity of one's conviction and the strength of character to stand by and stand up for them do not imply trying to make a needless impression on the mass. One does not need to be approved, glorified or validated by these mundanes.

I agree completely; it is purely a question of personal integrity, ethics, and honor. I am still - and some would say naïvely - very much an Eagle Scout about these things.

That, incidentally, has been just as true for my professional work in Special Forces, PSYOP, Intelligence, and Politico-Military Affairs as for abstract philosophy. It won me both respect/commendation and occasional hot water. For the same reason I am very glad that I retired before the GWBush administration, because I think the hot water would have increased intolerably.
_________________________
Michael A. Aquino

Top
#40752 - 07/24/10 01:52 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
Michael A.Aquino Offline
stalker


Registered: 09/28/08
Posts: 2573
Loc: San Francisco, CA, USA
 Originally Posted By: Raffy
Seems Mr Myatt has now left Islam and developed his own philosophy called The Numinous Way aka the philosophy of the Numen.

As is assuredly his prerogative. I just took a look at it here, and it reads very positively and, well, Gaia-tively. Perhaps a bit naïvely idealistic, but who am I to talk? Definitely an improvement on the ONA stuff he was sending me back in the '80s.

 Quote:
Now, while you and others are free to assume that Myatt is Long, there's actually no direct evidence that he is. Only opinion, and speculation, and rumor.

Not that I really give a damn, but of course he wrote under those names. The letters he sent me under them were on the same paper, with the same typewriter, with identical writing style, handwriting, content assumptions, etc. [I used to do document analysis as part of my job, remember?]

There is nothing wrong with using pseudonyms unless for a cowardly or unethical purpose. Anton LaVey used numerous names: John M. Kincaid, Hugo Zorilla, Eric Zann, etc. - sometimes for fun, sometimes as an in-joke, sometimes so that his own signature wouldn't color or overpower the message. Why Myatt played transparent name-games was his own business.
_________________________
Michael A. Aquino

Top
#40753 - 07/24/10 02:06 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Michael A.Aquino]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino
There is nothing wrong with using pseudonyms unless for a cowardly or unethical purpose.


This is of course highly subjective. In the end, what is ethical and what is cowardly? Personally I see nothing wrong with using different names to write whatever is needed as long as it is a means to an end and does not compromise one's own ethics which do not necessarily align with other ethics.

D.

Top
#40754 - 07/24/10 02:23 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Michael A.Aquino]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino
Perhaps a bit naïvely idealistic, but who am I to talk?


I appreciate your reasoned response.

Myatt's recently given his philosophy a more, well, philosophical base, as at

http://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/myatt-the-philosophy-of-the-numen.pdf

As for "naïvely idealistic" perhaps we'll agree to disagree here - for I'd prefer to say optimistic about our potential to change, to consciously evolve.


 Originally Posted By: Michael A.Aquino


Not that I really give a damn, but of course he wrote under those names. The letters he sent me under them were on the same paper, with the same typewriter, with identical writing style, handwriting, content assumptions, etc. [I used to do document analysis as part of my job, remember?]


Still, since I assume you have no direct correspondence from Mr Myatt, using his own name, to make a comparison, it's still an assumption you're making about the author of such letters.

But this is quibbling.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#40755 - 07/24/10 02:28 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Diavolo]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: Diavolo
This is of course highly subjective. In the end, what is ethical and what is cowardly?


Well said.

I think Anton Long and the ONA crowd would say that it's up to each of us, individually, to define what we feel or believe or even assume is ethical.

That what matters is "us, and them"; us, and those damn mundanes.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41228 - 08/01/10 04:01 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: merickal80]
SODOMIZER Offline
pledge


Registered: 07/04/10
Posts: 61
 Originally Posted By: merickal80
An embarrassing new picture of David Myatt has emerged, exposing David Myatt as a 'Satanist' whose written work is rendered worthless because of its lack of provenance.


Please explain. Seems to me he's a thinker like any influential mind and should be analyzed on the merit of his ideas.
_________________________
SC / O9A

Top
#41272 - 08/02/10 02:28 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: SODOMIZER]
The Zebu Offline
senior member


Registered: 08/08/08
Posts: 1646
Loc: Orlando, FL
ANOTHER EMBARRASSING NEW PICTURE OF DAVID MYATT



 Quote:
BBC, Shropshire - A compromising new photo of nazitastic occultist-turned-Jihadist and all-round country gent David Myatt has recently surfaced on the internet. The photo, which shows the white supremacist engaging in oral sex with a black man, has caused outrage and scandal among a rabble of people who apparently care about such things.

A longtime activist for far-right causes, Myatt recently converted to Islam and now endorses terrorism and the methods of Osama Bin Laden in his vision of overthrowing western society. He has also been rumored to also go by the name of Anton Long, as the founder of the Order of Nine Angles, a satanic cult which encourages human sacrifice.

Myatt has repeatedly opposed such allegations of Satanism, saying, "I have never had any involvement with the ONA, nor am I the persona behind Anton Long, regardless of how awesome, brilliant, or devilishly sexy he may be. To any dishonorable fools who try to propagate such lies, I challenge them to a manly duel to the death using broadswords while wearing nothing but sheepskin loincloths."

Richard Scott, a neonazi activist with ties to the BNP, is not surprised by the revelation of Myatt's interracial escapades. "He's off his rocker; the bloke's a sodding race traitor," he said in a characteristically British accent. "First he joins Islam, and now he's sucking off blacks. I mean, everyone knows that it's the black guy that should be sucking the white guy's dick, in an arousing display of virile but completely heterosexual dominance of racial superiority."

Kayla of the White Star Acception, an ONA-linked organization, has a different perspective. She believes that Myatt's switch to Islam was a strategic move to fulfill his own secret motives that go beyond religion or race. "He's using Islam as tool, a method of global aeonic change to fulfill his personal destiny. I respect that," she said. "And I'm sure that he has a very good reason for deep-throating a black stallion as well. It may seem like he's just a very confused man, but this most certainly has some very dark and sinister wyrdful implications that we simply may not be aware of at this moment. It just goes to show how much he's transcended society's attempts to confine him, defying silly labels such as 'nazi' and 'muslim' by taking nine inches of black cock in his mouth."

Others are convinced that the photo is merely a digital fabrication by a bored American college student who spends too much time on the internet.

More news as this develops.
_________________________
«Recibe, ¡oh Lucifer! la sangre de esta víctima que sacrifico en tu honor.»

Top
#41313 - 08/02/10 05:22 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Diavolo]
SODOMIZER Offline
pledge


Registered: 07/04/10
Posts: 61
 Originally Posted By: Diavolo
I see nothing wrong with using different names to write whatever is needed as long as it is a means to an end


I agree here. Sometimes anonymity is needed; selecting certain death over returning to the fight is in my view, cowardly unless it achieves some massively powerful goal (like flying planes into the World Trade Center; all politics aside, that was a massive victory for the perpetrators).
_________________________
SC / O9A

Top
#41350 - 08/03/10 12:36 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: SODOMIZER]
Morgan Offline
Princess of Hell
stalker


Registered: 08/29/07
Posts: 2956
Loc: New York City
I hate photoshop, and I can photoshop better than that.

What a fucking waste of time clicking on this thread.

M
_________________________
Courage Conquering Fear
Fuck em if they can't take a joke
Don't Like What I Say, Kiss My Ass



Top
#41466 - 08/05/10 11:57 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Morgan]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: Morgan
I hate photoshop

Yeah - someone from Junior High playing around.

No, wait - someone who would make a good opfer \:\)

One test failed already ;\)
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41467 - 08/05/10 11:59 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: The Zebu]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: The Zebu
ANOTHER EMBARRASSING NEW PICTURE OF DAVID MYATT

Another juvenile playing around with photoshop.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41482 - 08/05/10 03:37 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
6Satan6Archist6 Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2509
Another one liner.

And another.

And another.

And another.

While this Photoshop job is undeniably juvenile it is also pretty funny, to me at least. And I think that was the ultimate purpose of this picture; to be funny not insulting. The OP should have taken the liberty to do make this photo first. At least then it would have actually been embarrassing, even though it is an obvious fake.

So you think TheZebu would make a good "opfer" because he has a sense of humor? That is pretty asinine if you ask me. Yes, I know you didn't ask me but I don't give a shit.

Everyone needs to have a sense of humor, even if they do like to think they are ONA.

All that being said, pictures like the one in question should only be posted sparingly, if at all, lest this place turn into 4chan*.

*No offense to 4chan, I like to waste time there on occasion.
_________________________
No gods. No masters.

Top
#41485 - 08/05/10 04:53 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: 6Satan6Archist6]
Conrad Offline
Banned
stranger


Registered: 10/04/09
Posts: 9
 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
Everyone needs to have a sense of humor, even if they do like to think they are ONA.


Well then, here's your ONA-sponsored laugh of the day:


Top
#41490 - 08/05/10 10:14 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Conrad]
Fist Moderator Offline
veteran member


Registered: 08/31/07
Posts: 1453
Loc: B'mo Cautious MF
Good grief, is that Blackwood?

In any event, other than the pick and the oneliner do you have anything else to add?
_________________________
I am the Devil and I am here to do the Devil's work.

Top
#41495 - 08/06/10 12:01 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: 6Satan6Archist6]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
While this Photoshop job is undeniably juvenile it is also pretty funny,

It's just so mundane. Something a mundane does and would do. One might expect, well, something more creative, original, from a member of the satanic elite.

Juvenile in the sense of adolescent and immature; in the sense of passé; of being just so unoriginal in subject matter; with that subject matter of the lavatory kind that occupies the thoughts of many adolescents, and with that type of fake having been done in respect of others just so many times before.

Now if one had put the person in suitable robes, with an ONA sigil in some sort of Satanic temple of the kind described in, say, the ONA's Black Book (Mass of Heresy, perhaps) and then had some quotes from Myatt denying involvement with the ONA, it might have been both fun and of some humorous use. But too much effort, I guess - too much thinking outside the juvenile box.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41507 - 08/06/10 06:05 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: SkaffenAmtiskaw]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: MawhrinSkel
For Pete's sake, brighten up, guys.

Or - for Satan's sake, guys and gals, act like Satanists, not like Untermenschen.

Such a preoccupation with, and the sloppy use of, such juvenile stuff in adults is somewhat typical of Untermenschen.

Sloppy; lazy. Indicative of a lack of that self control, that self mastery, that cold rational thought, that are - or should be - some of the things that distinguishes us from them.

Trouble is, this internet allows us to put out our sloppy lazy work instantly, to others. Kinda like those Untermenschen you see on the Jerry Springer show who just can't stop themselves sounding off \:\)

/rant for the day ;\)
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41508 - 08/06/10 06:29 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
Dimitri Offline
stalker


Registered: 07/13/08
Posts: 3139
 Quote:
Such a preoccupation with, and the sloppy use of, such juvenile stuff in adults is somewhat typical of Untermenschen.

It might be said this particular post of Zebu might be considered as "juvenile", I found it quite hilarious.
It's called humour, it is a tool which can be used to give critics or to destress heated moments.

Life is not always to be looked upon seriously, enjoy a good laugh. Or did you find it offensive since you see it as degrading a person you look up to? I bet you'd have had a good laugh with this one: Blackwood died. Which is quite on the same level as the text and picture quoted by Zebu. Don't try to take yourself too seriously, it will only result in an explosion of laughter..

On another note; try for once evading words like "Untermensch", "mudanes", "culling" if you barely have an idea what these mean or power they carry would ya?

 Quote:
Sloppy; lazy. Indicative of a lack of that self control, that self mastery, that cold rational thought, that are - or should be - some of the things that distinguishes us from them.
And for the love of the flying spaghetti monster, in this place there is no "us" or "we".
You barely talk the talk and in no way walk the walk.


Edited by Dimitri (08/06/10 06:32 AM)
_________________________
Ut vivat, crescat et floreat

Top
#41509 - 08/06/10 06:44 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Dimitri]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
I think Raffy touched a very important point here.

Let's not waste too much time on the err blasphemous image of Myatt. I didn't lose any sleep over it and although it was intended as humorous, I assume it is only to those who didn't encounter such collages before. With a different approach and more refinement, I am sure something could have been created which was not only humorous and excellent, but also would bring the creator's point across. Now it is just a poor attempt.
Is it juvenile? Of course but since Zeb is young, such is to be expected on occasions. I can't say it is his normal behavior so I don't really hold it against him.

But the point is that with all the pretense most satanists have, many seem to have a hard time living up to that. Mind you, it is the same all over the internet. The mature people, who as a modus operandi, have a civilized or noble approach towards others, or in their displayed behavior, are outnumbered by those who prefer to not do the effort and apply what I call the Plebeian approach.

It is not only the uneducated or illiterate out there, it can even be witnessed amongst those that are well educated or have respectable positions in society. The ironic part is that most of these would rather drop dead than display such a behavior in (real) public but when entering the internet, it seems to be a different case.

I prefer people to be at their best, because if they aren't, they are just like them out there.

D.

Top
#41517 - 08/06/10 11:09 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
6Satan6Archist6 Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2509
And who are you to talk about "rational thought". You are the one who feels that anyone who is not like you is "mundane" and should therefore be ruled over, or culled, by people who are like you.

Why do you care so much about that photo? Do you think Myatt would give you a pat on the back for running to his defense like that? I suspect that if that picture had been of anyone else, you wouldn't be so quick to condemn it as juvenile and lazy.
_________________________
No gods. No masters.

Top
#41577 - 08/07/10 07:13 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Dimitri]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: Dimitri
It's called humour,

To be precise - that (to which we are referring) is called juvenile humor; or mundane humor.

Now mature, sinister, humor might be describing such a juvenile humorist as a possible candidate for culling \:\)

But I guess you had to be there - in the grotto - to appreciate such dark humor ;\)

 Originally Posted By: Dimitri
You barely talk the talk and in no way walk the walk.

Yawn. Now that is just such a mundane response. So predictable.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41578 - 08/07/10 07:30 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: 6Satan6Archist6]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
And who are you to talk about "rational thought". You are the one who feels that anyone who is not like you is "mundane" and should therefore be ruled over, or culled, by people who are like you.

I shall quibble with your use of the expression "not like me", since "not like our sinister/satanic kind" would be correct.

Given that correction, what is not rational about the proposition that since mundanes are inferior beings, they can be put to good use and are expendable?

 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
Why do you care so much about that photo?

Assumption. One not based on anything I have so far written here.

The issue is not the subject of the photo per se, but rather the mundanity of the fake. Like I said, a type of fake done so many times before by so many mundanes who seem to have a juvenile obsession with such subject matter.

Such a lack of sinister thought - of really dark, satanic, humor.

 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
I suspect that if that picture had been of anyone else, you wouldn't be so quick to condemn it as juvenile and lazy.

Would you condemn, for whatever reason, a similar picture of Aquino?

Or would you just accept it was mature humor? Or would you agree that it was rather juvenile? Or even the product of a mundane mind?
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41579 - 08/07/10 07:35 PM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
6Satan6Archist6 Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2509
Wow, you sure say "mundane" a lot. Kind of like a broken record.

I wonder what criteria you are using to designate who is or isn't a part of the so-called sinister brethren. If you base it off the "Guide to becoming a Satanist" and that stupid little oath and blood letting ceremony described therein, I am certainly not a part of that brethren. If that is the case then I welcome, nay, dare you to try to come cull me.

No I wouldn't condemn a similar picture of Aquino. I would probably laugh at it, just like I did at the one of Myatt. I would agree that such a thing would be juvenile, but still funny.
_________________________
No gods. No masters.

Top
#41599 - 08/08/10 03:17 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: 6Satan6Archist6]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
Wow, you sure say "mundane" a lot.

Wow, people here use "satanist" a lot - kinda like a broken record, no?!

What is the opposite of satanic/sinister? Why, it's mundane-ness.

 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
I wonder what criteria you are using to designate who is or isn't a part of the so-called sinister brethren.

It's all out there, if you're really interested, and thus read more than one or two exoteric documents.

But here's a clue - mundane-ness is esoterically defined as being the manufacture of, the adherence to, and/or a belief in, causal abstractions.

 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
dare you

Are we back in Junior High already? Gee, I thought it was still summer vacation.

 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
I would agree that such a thing would be juvenile, but still funny.

Strange then than noone seems to have done that with Aquino, since it appears many here would find that funny.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41601 - 08/08/10 03:33 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
Dan_Dread Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/08/08
Posts: 3888
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
Wow. You ONA types are guilty of more high school antics than any other group tied to Satanism in existence. You guys bring up blackwood more than he himself does, you are the best publicists he could ask for. You even write a fake book full of junior high style homoerotic humour, and attribute it to him. Ya that's really elite, super clever.

Yet when someone says boo about myatt, you have the gall to start whining like a toddler that has had his toys taken away, about of all things, a lack of maturity. Really classic.

And the whole theme of you and your 'brethren' being in any way superior certainly hasn't been evidenced in your contributions here. On the contrary, your word for word parroting of myatts thoughts about culling and constant use of 'myattisms' every third word of your post just screams mindless follower. Have you ever had an independent thought?

What have you contributed?

If you truly believe in what you preach you should probably commit suicide asap. If mundane is to mean average, unexceptional or boring, you are a prime candidate to be culled.
_________________________
ADM
ideological vandal

Top
#41604 - 08/08/10 04:19 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Dan_Dread]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: Dan_Dread
You ONA types are guilty of more high school antics than any other group tied to Satanism in existence.

That's what called a gross generalization. It's inaccurate, and fallacious.

There is no ONA "type" - given the nature of the ONA.

That you assume there is, shows a misunderstanding of the ONA. Plus, you then assume that I belong to this "type" you have so assumed, which further assumption is not warranted by anything I have written here.

The fact that some who follow the ONA method may sometimes make fun of others in a certain way, does not mean that all do, or that such antics are expected.


 Originally Posted By: Dan_Dread
Yet when someone says boo about myatt, you have the gall to start whining like a toddler

Yet again you seem to be among those who have missed the point, and seem to have not read or not understood a previous reply of mine.

To wit, it is not about the subject of the fake (Myatt) but about the juvenile nature of the fake, and the fact one would expect someone following the satanic way (which is of self excellence among other things) to be able to do much better than contribute such a juvenile fake of a type so unoriginal it's mundane.

But it seems the capacity for cold rational thought, here, is quite minimal. Do please prove me wrong. Making personal assumptions about someone based on projecting one's already formed often emotive views, regarding certain matters, onto them does not amount to applying cold reason.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41605 - 08/08/10 05:01 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
6Satan6Archist6 Offline
stalker


Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 2509
You are a tool.

I like how you completely dodged my question asking what criteria you were using to define a mundane and whether or not you were basing it off that which is found in the "Guide to becoming a Satanist".

 Quote:
But here's a clue - mundane-ness is esoterically defined as being the manufacture of, the adherence to, and/or a belief in, causal abstractions.


"Casual abstractions"? Define or shut the fuck up.

 Quote:
Are we back in Junior High already? Gee, I thought it was still summer vacation.


That might be the case, if I wasn't serious. I can assure you that I am quite serious. Yes, quite serious indeed; bring it, you "sinister" ONA tough guy. Here is someone whom is not a part of your sinister brethren telling you to put your money where your mouth is.

 Quote:
Strange then than noone seems to have done that with Aquino, since it appears many here would find that funny.


Those are the words of someone who does not understand that which they speak of. I know of two such incidents where Aquino has been the subject of satire in a user created image. One of them was a cartoon done by the very same member who posted the "shopped" image of Myatt and the other was one made by another member and has also recently been posted in another thread.

Your move, Sherlock.
_________________________
No gods. No masters.

Top
#41617 - 08/08/10 07:57 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: 6Satan6Archist6]
Raffy Offline
pledge


Registered: 10/20/09
Posts: 76
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
I like how you completely dodged my question asking what criteria you were using to define a mundane

I admire the way you missed how I defined a mundane.

Please explain how you missed that definition of a mundane.

Please also explain how you require some "criteria" in order to understand a simple definition?

AFAIK a definition does not require any "criteria" to explain it. Or do you not understand what a definition is?

Please also explain why you seem to want everything - about mundanes - explained to you here when you have already been given a definition, and when everything else you require to be explained is already explained in various ONA texts that you do not seem to have bothered to read.

Or is the intellectual curiosity to find such answers, for yourself, and then rationally - for yourself - consider the matter at hand, and reach your own conclusions, just too much?

I guess so, considering that you also write -

 Originally Posted By: 6Satan6Archist6
Yes, quite serious indeed; bring it, you "sinister" ONA tough guy. Here is someone whom is not a part of your sinister brethren telling you to put your money where your mouth is.

So mundane. So very juvenile. If you cannot understand this, you cannot. Understand what? That if you have to resort to such silly playground antics rather than engage in serious debate, on an impersonal forum designed for such debate, then you have already lost the argument.
_________________________
Those who are not our sinister brothers or sisters are mundanes

Top
#41618 - 08/08/10 08:30 AM Re: David Myatt - Embarrassing New Picture [Re: Raffy]
Dimitri Offline
stalker


Registered: 07/13/08
Posts: 3139
 Quote:
To be precise - that (to which we are referring) is called juvenile humor; or mundane humor.

Now mature, sinister, humor might be describing such a juvenile humorist as a possible candidate for culling

As such you only seem to enforce my point of view and continue to show your true nature. I kind of expected this response to be given, almost anyone guilty of accusations given tend to come up with this dried out ignorant excuse. I would have been pleasantly surprised if you didn't response actually.

 Quote:
But I guess you had to be there - in the grotto - to appreciate such dark humor

Thanks, but I had an appointment with batman in his batcave while you were discussing your serious humor...

 Quote:
Yawn. Now that is just such a mundane response. So predictable.

I hate to disappoint my fans


Edited by Dimitri (08/08/10 08:34 AM)
_________________________
Ut vivat, crescat et floreat

Top
Page all of 3 123>


Moderator:  SkaffenAmtiskaw, fakepropht, TV is God, Woland, Asmedious, Fist 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.055 seconds of which 0.002 seconds were spent on 58 queries. Zlib compression disabled.