#41369 - 08/03/10 01:29 PM
Gut Check: Mosque at Ground Zero?
|
Fnord
active member
Registered: 01/11/10
Posts: 717
Loc: Texas
|
Looks like this project has cleared another hurdle.
All religious considerations aside, do you see this as progress or a thumb in the eye?
Personally, I'm for the latter simply because it feels a lot like turning the other cheek to me.
What say you 600 Club?
New York City Panel Clears Way for Mosque Near Ground Zero: A New York City panel voted unanimously Tuesday to reject landmark status for a building near the World Trade Center site, paving the way for construction of a mosque and an Islamic community center. Rest of the article
_________________________
Scratching Peace Symbols on Your Tombstone
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41375 - 08/03/10 02:44 PM
Re: Gut Check: Mosque at Ground Zero?
[Re: William Wright]
|
Dimitri
veteran member
Registered: 07/13/08
Posts: 1357
|
I don’t see this as turning the other cheek, because (presumably) the Muslims who want to build the mosque weren’t involved in the terrorist attack. These are, as far as we know, law-abiding citizens who simply want to build someplace to peacefully assemble for purposes of religious expression.
Well you might see them as not being involved in the terrorist attacks, but I can imagine many other people who will see it the other way. I mean, the attacks after all were being done by muslims.
Law-abiding citizens? I have noticed that when letting foreign cultures "invade" a country and give them the freedom to practice their religion a certain respect is being blackmailed from both the countries leaders and from the "invaders". (As noticed here in Belgium/Europe). The persons at long term will somehow push forth certain rules of honour and conduct which are alien, and sometimes considered amoral, within the invaded country thus leading towards certain conflicts which could have otherwise been evaded.
I think the particular behaviour of moving towards a foreign country and slowly implementing rules, guidelines and ideas from the original culture as the numbers of ghettos and people multiply was a strategy of psychological warfare.
_________________________
You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41379 - 08/03/10 03:00 PM
Re: Gut Check: Mosque at Ground Zero?
[Re: SkaffenAmtiskaw]
|
Fnord
active member
Registered: 01/11/10
Posts: 717
Loc: Texas
|
I think putting *any* religious edifice on Ground Zero is an affront to the bereaved. I don't care if said bereaved would like a church, temple or ecumenical place of worship - it would still demean the place.
That's what I was thinking when I framed the conversation "religious considerations aside"... it may be a mistake on my part to attempt this discussion outside of a religious context since 9/11 happened within one.
I was in full support of rebuilding the towers exactly as they stood before. Not sure what happened to that plan.
I'll check out that movie, thanks for the recommendation.
_________________________
Scratching Peace Symbols on Your Tombstone
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41380 - 08/03/10 03:10 PM
Re: Gut Check: Mosque at Ground Zero?
[Re: Fnord]
|
Dimitri
veteran member
Registered: 07/13/08
Posts: 1357
|
I was in full support of rebuilding the towers exactly as they stood before. Not sure what happened to that plan.
Or as a Belgian comedian once said: "Rebuild it twice the height, twice as big as the ones before with a huge target in the middle just to fuck with their minds. And maybe put a pita-shop on top of it".
Bad translation and more funny parts are lost because of it, but it sure shows more attitude..
_________________________
You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41392 - 08/03/10 07:34 PM
Re: Gut Check: Mosque at Ground Zero?
[Re: SkaffenAmtiskaw]
|
zippadydooda
pledge
Registered: 08/09/09
Posts: 61
Loc: San Diego, California
|
I wouldn't call them patriots.
Yet to ensure due freedom for everyone, the freedom of each must be curbed, restrained and regulated.
^ That's not freedom.
As for the building of any mosque or religious center at Ground Zero, I see that move as diametrically opposed to the American way, and more importantly, my personal beleifs.
If this plan goes through, I hope the building gets hit by an airplane.
_________________________
Blathering nonsense.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#41394 - 08/03/10 08:11 PM
Re: Gut Check: Mosque at Ground Zero?
[Re: Fnord]
|
Michael A.Aquino
veteran member
Registered: 09/28/08
Posts: 1247
Loc: San Francisco, CA, USA
|
[MindWar Rant Mode ON] 
This entire situation has been handled unbelievably idiotically since 9/11 happened. Bush & Co. chose to contextualize it as a "radical Islam" thing instead of what it should have been: an international criminal thing (like drug cartels, the Mafia, etc.). So we attacked two Islamic nations (neither of which as a nation attacked us), and have gloriously managed to infuriate, hence "radicalize", far more Muslims than Osama bL could ever have fantasized. And Islam is big: about 1-1/2 billion worldwide/about 22% of the world's population. Talk about the stupidest choice of an enemy you could possibly set out to aggravate.
This is great for the military/industrial complex and for politicians who control their constituents through fear; it gives them a nice, permanent war, which is what they were desperately looking for when the previous boogeyman, "Communism!", collapsed at the end of the '80s.
Do most Westerners (by which we really mean European-style Christians) like Islam? No. So what? Who says that everybody has to like everybody else's religion, dietary choices, love/sex practices, or otherwise-lifestyles? Don't like a particular country's style, don't go there.
"Terrorism!" is a knee-jerk propaganda term, nothing more. All the more OhMyGodding because it has the word "terror" in it, which everyone knows is scary. But what is the phenomenon actually? Just fighting by groups which aren't official government armies and don't wear uniforms. In the '60s we used to call them "guerrillas", which was Che Guevara-cool. In my day the Special Forces could work either with or against Gs, whichever was more convenient; indeed SF was originally conceived to create and train Gs, just like the WW2 undergrounds.
Then the concept morphed into "insurgents" and "counterinsurgency" since as it turned out the USA got into the habit of suppressing change rather than facilitating it around the world. Today it's all simplified as Tism, which means everybody operating outside of the established government club, no matter what jerks some of those clubmembers happen to be.
So if this whole mess had been handled by monolith-enhanced dolphins, it wouldn't make a damned bit of difference what sort of religious building is planned near Ground Zero. We would just be after the individuals who did the crime, as criminals.
[MindWar Rant Mode OFF]
_________________________
Michael A. Aquino
[On Ignore: Dan_Dread, 6Satan6Archist6, Caladrius, MindFux]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Woland, Mercury_Templar, fakepropht, Nemesis, SkaffenAmtiskaw, Morgan, Bacchae, Diavolo, Asmedious, Fist
|
|