Page 17 of 23 « First<1516171819>Last »
Topic Options
#61919 - 11/27/11 02:48 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Apeynon Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/04/11
Posts: 40
Loc: In Your Bedroom Pillow
 Originally Posted By: Khk
that there is a strange tendency, when someone like you, or DarkLogos, or SinisterMoon, loses an argument or cannot get a person to agree with him,

Lost? Pleaze...

Agree? Who cares? I don't.

 Originally Posted By: Khk
I find even stranger, that that person usually has an intimate knowledge of the ONA OG and challenges others to test themselves against it.

I find it strange that you ignored me saying that I found something not quite right about your posts. Why did I say that?

Top
#61920 - 11/27/11 02:49 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Apeynon]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398
 Originally Posted By: Apeynon
 Originally Posted By: Khk
Then in response - yet another oh-so-secret aspect of the Darkest Tradition grounded in Pre-Sumeria pops up out of nowhere that's been around 'forever' and hidden from the profane

Ever wondered where Binan Ath Ga Wath Am comes from?


+O+ It's Old English my old son. It's NOT Pre-Sumerian - none of the DG's are. So what? Frankly - if you don't know what an abstract is, prattle on about DOING and the ESSENCE, and can't communicate in any other means but intellectual semantics - why is it you, some complete stranger, can educate me, on the ONA? And on all the things WELL Beyond that cult? +O+

Top
#61921 - 11/27/11 02:52 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Apeynon]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398

I find it strange that you ignored me saying that I found something not quite right about your posts. Why did I say that?

+O+ No - you want to believe I ignored you because you seek to give the impression I am hiding something - but you are too, aren't ya. +O+

Top
#61922 - 11/27/11 02:55 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Apeynon Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/04/11
Posts: 40
Loc: In Your Bedroom Pillow
 Originally Posted By: Khk
Flannoyed

You were rumbled early on, me thinks. But it's been good sport, while it lasted.

But by all means present to others, here - and possibly even to yourself - you as ONA muse.

You really should know why 'we' keep popping up, over the years. If not, I'm not going to explain it.

Top
#61923 - 11/27/11 02:56 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Apeynon]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398
+O+ Please don't. And go play the Star Game. +O+
Top
#61924 - 11/27/11 02:59 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398
+O+ Well then, ladies and gentlemen - all that nonsense aside - we now return you to your regular viewing. +O+
Top
#61925 - 11/27/11 02:59 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Apeynon Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/04/11
Posts: 40
Loc: In Your Bedroom Pillow
 Originally Posted By: Khk
It's Old English my old son. It's NOT Pre-Sumerian - none of the DG's are

Oh dear. There is a document in circulation among the OG - written by an authority on the subject - with the titleThe Dark Gods In Antiquity.

That you don't have access to it, must mean it doesn't exist.

If you really believe Binan Ath... is OE, by all means write an article on the subject proving it.

Top
#61926 - 11/27/11 03:01 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Apeynon Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/04/11
Posts: 40
Loc: In Your Bedroom Pillow
 Originally Posted By: Khk
all that nonsense aside - we now return you to your regular viewing.

Indeed.

I refer to right honourable gentleman to the image in a previous reply of mine.

Top
#61927 - 11/27/11 03:01 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Apeynon]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398
 Originally Posted By: Apeynon
[quote=Khk]It's Old English my old son. It's NOT Pre-Sumerian - none of the DG's are

Oh dear. There is a document in circulation among the OG - written by an authority on the subject - with the titleThe Dark Gods In Antiquity.

+O+ LOL. Oh you fucking clown... +O+

That you don't have access to it, must mean it doesn't exist.

+O+ Yep. Must do. +O+

If you really believe Binan Ath... is OE, by all means write an article on the subject proving it.

+O+ So you can steal it? No thanks. +O+

Top
#61928 - 11/27/11 03:08 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Apeynon Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/04/11
Posts: 40
Loc: In Your Bedroom Pillow
 Originally Posted By: Khk
Oh you fucking clown

Your reply says it all, really.

As for you having copies of Azoth and Exeat, ha-ha. It's strange you've never published them. What was the date of the first and last issues of both?

But do carry on and have fun here, as elsewhere. For me, it's EOT.

Top
#61929 - 11/27/11 03:08 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398
+O+ Right. I've had enough of you now. Thanks for that chat Da... er, Apeynon. +O+
Top
#61930 - 11/27/11 03:11 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398
+O+ For fuck sake son, let it go. One last round. That date would be: Issue 34 (Summer Solstice) yf101 [1990 ev]. Now go away and learn what an abstract is before you try to lecture others on the matter.+O+
Top
#61931 - 11/27/11 03:12 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Khk Offline
member


Registered: 09/07/08
Posts: 398
+O+ And to think - I used to look up to you. +O+
Top
#61932 - 11/27/11 03:17 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Khk]
Apeynon Offline
stranger


Registered: 11/04/11
Posts: 40
Loc: In Your Bedroom Pillow
 Originally Posted By: Khk
Thanks for that chat Da... er, Apeynon

Sorry couldn't resist replying, as that's just so funny! Aquino syndrome comes to mind here. We're all DM now didn't you know? Even Chloe \:\)

 Originally Posted By: Khk
And to think - I used to look up to you

Excellent! Now perhaps O9A 3.0 and beyond can flourish...

Top
#61933 - 11/27/11 03:34 PM Re: Interrogistic Symbolism [Re: Apeynon]
Diavolo Offline
RIP
stalker


Registered: 09/02/07
Posts: 4997
Could we maybe stick to some sort of debate and leave the who what where out of it?

Thanks,

D.

Top
Page 17 of 23 « First<1516171819>Last »


Moderator:  Woland, TV is God, fakepropht, SkaffenAmtiskaw, Asmedious, Fist 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.028 seconds of which 0.004 seconds were spent on 28 queries. Zlib compression disabled.